Quote:
Originally Posted by PairTheBoard
In the fully self sufficient anti-society, everyone will be born a hermaphrodite so they can all go **** themselves.
PairTheBoard
Wait a min Mr "i am ok with a little sh@# in my hands just as long as soap and water are mixing it all up any second now to a mess before its all clean and victory is in place" where does it compute that it is antisociety to be self sufficient or that citizens of a system that is made to be self sustainable and powerful if needed to take care of its members locally without massive external help is now antisocial or anti sex even.
I would imagine you become exactly that, self sufficient in order to be more socially powerful and assist the community with your own prosperity become even better system that more people are happier and are not suffering from the basic needs ( 0.9 bil people are not eating enough every day and over 1 bil are not having access to water and over 4 bil do not even have 5k in their name)
To get to a place that not many are suffering you need the home itself to be helping the individual as much as possible. So produce a world that the home is powerful and efficient and a true secure place if needed. AI robots can manage the productivity of the home base.
We can defeat a lot of our threats if we have a stronger structure that belongs to all and then we build our individual desires above that minimum leaving nobody behind to suffer missing essential things.
The most essential thing for a society is to take care of its threats first before other options and noise. It is elementary. Something missed by capitalism, communism and any other ism seen so far.
Higher prosperity will make even sex more entertaining, secure and fun. Fun can still be random and creative and private.
And lets not forget as much as a driving force sex is it remains a ploy by nature to get something out of you that is not done properly leads to a world of misery but nature has won to have younger versions thrown at the mayhem of survival. Nature cares to continue the statistical mayhem to progress and i believe we are better than that. So probably the wise position is to see sex as fun but for a reason that doesnt necessarily improve you as an individual (only because chemically you are made to derive satisfaction, vindication and self worthiness by experiencing pleasure) so it has to come with some logic and design into it (above its chemistry) in order not to undermine your choices in life and remain that fun. It has to be entertaining that way because it promotes the continuation much like hunger but at the end of the day although sex completes a relationship and offers pleasure to the other side too the first pure thoughts you have for a romantic target are not exactly focusing on F@#$# her for your own fun. If that is not the case then its probably not as engaging as it deserves to be.