Quote:
Originally Posted by masque de Z
The problem is that many imagine some monolithic savant idiot for the kind of physicist i suggest here. You could have a very rational discussion with Einstein about almost anything.
The physicists of the 70s and before were truly remarkable people. Capable, likeable, full of common sense, fairly well rounded. I think it's because physics was respected, European values were largely in play (and many were European immigrants), and physics was the true cutting edge and the source of the power of nations, so it attracted the best. And we were in a different age - less easy money.
Physics now seem to attract weedy nerds, at least in the US. I've been to Stanford physics lectures a few times and it's like being carpet bombed with fugly. It was a shock walking in, I almost walked back and check the sign to see if it wasn't a conference on cures for genetic disorders. Even worse, I had my very hot girlfriend with me, who like most classy European women gets moist at meeting non-deformed physics grads.
So I'm not all that taken with your comparison with the giants of old. They simply don't exist any more. The premier famous scientist of today is a cabbage who says stupid things about the environment. Not a functioning brain cell there. Maybe narrow savantism/training/focus in math.
Quote:
Also science is as good as the current version surely but that is way better than any other system, of beliefs. It constantly cares to improve unlike those that care only for their team winning.
Marxism cared to constantly improve too, always improving the lot of the worker. Using science no less.
The greatest system in the world today is the free market. It makes scientists look like impotent clowns. A scientific society that you fantasize about would be a dystopia, soon invaded by countries more intelligent.