Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTheMick2
It wasn't hyperbole. He made specific claims that are testable. A noble effort on his part.
If you only focus on the range of his untestable claims and falsifiable claims; and omit the advancement of thought that came from his individualistic and meaningful framework.
Plus you have to stigmatize the imagination, delegating it to a non-vital force of humanity because it doesn't jibe well with math-perfection, averages, or replication.
However if you factor in imagination, unconsciousness, dreaming. Then that becomes a place to explore, only with evidence that only matters to the observer and evidence that changes when the observer shares it. However we can report it, so it can be accumulated for the record.
Where Jung looked and how he looked is way more important than any particular of what he may have thought he discovered.