Quote:
Originally Posted by browni3141
Pascal's wager is trivially debunked. It relies on an assumption of the nature of God or gods.
What if God appreciates violence and bloodshed, and rewards those based on the number of people they have killed in battle? Genocide may be the best way to earn God's favor.
Wouldn't an AI that constrains itself from committing genocide for the reason stated in the OP also be relying on assumptions about its creator it can never verify?