Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread
View Poll Results: How would you want to go if the world had to end?
Zombie apocalypse
20 18.02%
Meteor collides into the earth
30 27.03%
Alien invasion
58 52.25%
Nuclear disaster, either from war or accident
3 2.70%

01-20-2013 , 06:12 PM
no no that's ted kaczinski's cabin in the woods
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
01-21-2013 , 03:34 AM
They wielded OJsBludyNife in order to capture him, so don't play dumb as if you weren't involved in this capture
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
01-21-2013 , 03:44 PM
I found more proof:

Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
01-21-2013 , 06:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OJsBludyNife
I just heard on the radio that there was a Bigfoot captured in Kentucky. Anybody hear about this. I googled it and there is just a bunch of random stories about BF, nothing about this specific capture.
yes they did. here is the picture:
Spoiler:
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
01-22-2013 , 04:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by archimedes11
"Daisy"? "Lennay" would be more appropriate.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
01-23-2013 , 11:35 AM
The evidence just keeps mounting up:

Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 12:48 AM
Doesnt it seem like its all fake in some way. Like our minds create our reality? As if our thoughts are a film projector and the world is a movie screen?

Has anyone ever bought into the holographic universe theory or perhaps any other intriguing possibilities they would like to discuss on this thread.

Sometimes I can just feel it in the core of my being, that things are in some way not as they appear.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 02:19 AM
If we can eventually simulate universes in our own, we are likely in a simulation ourselves.

http://www.simulation-argument.com/
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 02:57 AM
Adderall isn't real.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 03:29 AM
OP, good point. But the world works that predictably that I feel I have no other choice than to think it's real. If you don't come up with some credible evidence against it. Something going on only in 1-2 kg of brains isn't enough of evidence, imo, even if it was my own.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 03:33 AM
nothing that isn't cant be
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 03:42 AM
Define 'real' first. Even if the universe is holographic, it's still real.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 04:43 AM
I do
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 07:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sup hezbollah
Sometimes I can just feel it in the core of my being, that things are in some way not as they appear.
Just because things may not be as they appear doesn't mean those things aren't real.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 09:42 AM
http://youtu.be/mf5otGNbkuc

I like the idea that our brains evolved pragmatically to view and sense useful information around us although there is much more going on beyond the visible spectrum. It's easy to fool the senses (video).
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sup hezbollah
Doesnt it seem like its all fake in some way. Like our minds create our reality? As if our thoughts are a film projector and the world is a movie screen?

Has anyone ever bought into the holographic universe theory or perhaps any other intriguing possibilities they would like to discuss on this thread.

Sometimes I can just feel it in the core of my being, that things are in some way not as they appear.
define real
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 10:16 PM
I guess thats part of the issue. How does one define "real"?
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-19-2013 , 10:52 PM
02-19-2013 , 11:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sup hezbollah
I guess thats part of the issue. How does one define "real"?
Daniel Dennett has a talk on consciousness I think it was? Anyway he used an analogy, it went something like: When people say to a magician, upon learning his trick/illusion, hey! thats not real magic! He then states; Its funny how people define real magic as the type that doesn't exist IOW the type that is not real!

Anyway thats what I remember, if it applies to thread thats good too.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-20-2013 , 01:02 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryanb9
define real
Quote:
Originally Posted by sup hezbollah
I guess thats part of the issue. How does one define "real"?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/real

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/reality


I'm thinking about the simulation option like about the god question:
  1. Is there any credible evidence? - No
  2. Is there any reason to believe in it anyhow? - Why should we? It's like Occam's razor. Why construct some complicated theory to believe in, when a simpler one does the job?
  3. Naturally I'm positive to research about if the simulation/god theory has anything in it, but without any positive results it doesn't make the cut so far in describing reality

Last edited by plaaynde; 02-20-2013 at 01:26 AM.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-20-2013 , 01:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryanb9
define real
In context real is what remains unchanged (or very largely unchnaged for the nits) when I'm not there.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-20-2013 , 01:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
In context real is what remains unchanged (or very largely unchnaged for the nits) when I'm not there.
This is a very good and pedagocical explanation and a method to help finding out what "real" is. We have all kinds of things going on in our own minds, tendencies to religiosity, feelings, love, implanted beliefs, and so on. But with the quoted method it's principally possible to get rid of that bias when trying to discover what the objective reality is.

Last edited by plaaynde; 02-20-2013 at 01:43 AM.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-20-2013 , 06:30 AM


Timestamp embedding not working properly. Skip to 4:31.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-20-2013 , 07:12 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chezlaw
In context real is what remains unchanged (or very largely unchnaged for the nits) when I'm not there.
You don't know that anything changes, you also don't know that "you" are ever not there.

"Real" is what we call a thing that is there. "Reality" is the sum of all things that are there.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote
02-20-2013 , 07:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ramana
You don't know that anything changes, you also don't know that "you" are ever not there.
Yes. so we add skepticism to realism. They dont contradict at all and account for matters rather well.

Also yes I might be really really important to the scheme of things but as that's not required at all and it leads to all sorts of misleading egotoistical mumbo jumbo then why bother? if its needed for something then lets add it then.
Official Outer Limits/Debunking Thread Quote

      
m