Have posted pretty much this content in video form by the outstanding doctor and educator Andrew Kaufman but think it deserves a bit of breaking down and emphasising. Bearing in mind the following monumental turd has been used to justify the most insane epoch changing social, economic and security policies ever seen in the developed western world.
In February, New England Journal of Medicine published a report by the China Novel Coronavirus Investigating and Research Team. They claim, in a group of patients linked to a seafood wholesale market in Wuhan suffering from pneumonia of unknown cause, “human airway epithelial cells were used to
isolate a novel coronavirus, named 2019-nCoV”.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
“
Isolate” has a specific meaning in Biology – “to obtain (a substance or microorganism) in an
uncombined or
pure state.”
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/isolate
Was a “novel coronavirus named 2019-nCoV”
isolated?
“Bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid samples were collected in sterile cups to which
virus transport medium was added.”
What is ‘virus transport medium’ and could it affect the procedure adversely?
From the CDC: “Using a sterile pipette, aseptically add 2mL of the Gentamicin/Amphotericin B mixture from the
Antibiotic Preparation step to the bottle of HBSS”.
(
https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...ort-Medium.pdf)
As described by Dr Andrew Kaufman,
anti-biotics trigger exosome production by cells which influences the results of the electron microscopy. Confirmed here, “Antibiotic-induced release of small extracellular vesicles (exosomes) with surface-associated DNA”
(
https://www.exosome-rna.com/antibiot...ssociated-dna/).
It is unclear what is being imaged, exosomes or sars-cov2 viral particles?
Note the similarities in the characteristics of sars-cov2 and exosomes:
Diameter inside cell – both 500nm, Diameter outside cell – both 100nm, Receptor – both ACE-2, both contain RNA, both found in lung fluid.
Process used in the claimed “isolation”:
“Samples were then centrifuged to remove cellular debris.” This process separates by density but in no way can it be claimed to
purify – recall that “isolate” means “in
pure state, uncombined.”
“The supernatant was inoculated on human airway epithelial cells, which had been obtained from airway specimens resected from patients undergoing surgery for lung cancer and were confirmed to be special-pathogen-free by NGS”
The cell culture was then developed and analysed using electron microscopy. Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction- RT-PCR, (a manufacturing technique the Nobel Prize winning inventor of which Kary Mullis advised AGAINST using as a diagnostic tool yet moronic politicians insist on promoting more testing), is used to amplify the genetic sequences present in the culture. It would amplify potential viral RNA, but would also amplify whatever other junk RNA was present in the culture.
For more on this, and an expert debunk of the whole bit, see David Crowe
https://theinfectiousmyth.com/book/CoronavirusPanic.pdf
For a different perspective that accepts part of the sars narrative but rails against other aspects see Prof Beda Stadler – “So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person,
it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Correct: Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected]…
It is likely that a large number of the daily reported infection numbers are purely due to viral debris.”
https://www.globalresearch.ca/corona...-wrong/5718049
Finally the authors state “Although our study does not fulfill Koch’s postulates, our analyses provide evidence
implicating 2019-nCoV in the Wuhan outbreak”. Implicating?
“Koch's postulates are four criteria designed to establish a
causative relationship between a microbe and a disease” (wiki)
Implicate: bear some of the responsibility for
synonyms:
associate with (Oxford dictionaries)
Correlation: a mutual relationship or connection between two or more things.
synonyms:
association
Is this study a causal, ie scientific relation, or a correlation?
David Crowe – “it is possible that the RNA comes from another source, which could be the cells of the patient, bacteria, fungi etc. There might be an association with elevated levels of this RNA and illness, but that is not proof that the RNA is from a virus.
Without purification and characterization of virus particles, it cannot be accepted that an RNA test is proof that a virus is present.”
This has major ramifications for policy, track and trace testing surveillance regimes for instance. Will politicians listen to “the science” as they claim, or will they continue to be willingly/unknowingly hoodwinked by snakes from the WHO and its subordinates?