Is this your song?

I’m going to go into another worldwide phenomena known as Star Forts. There are hundreds of these structures everywhere in the world. WHO BUILT THEM ALL AND WHEN!?

Pretty pictures





AND NOW FOR THE SHOCKER


Videos on the subject are numerous and eye opening.

No, I just found it and the other song about the World Fair today.

This Dirt Deluge is fascinating. It happened everywhere and clearly happened somewhat recently too. If you live in a town with any history the next time you walk around scope out the buildings near you, you are certain to find nonsense, out of place windows and foundation work. Imagine what else could be buried!

OP moved to a more appropriate thread. Enjoy.

This is ridiculous. Will you at least break it out into its own thread. History was a fine forum for it too other than it's a dead forum.

No, it stays where I moved it or it gets deleted. Any more quires should be sent by PM to the Moderator. Thanks.

So instead of a thread about history belonging in the History forum you move it into a Science Math and Philosophy forum which has almost no relation to the topic at hand. And then don't even have the courtesy to keep it as its own topic condemning the thread to death. I said I didnt know the History mod when I optimistically posted there but I should have assumed that you're just as inept as the main mods. I don't even want to 'quiry' how you deem it to be unfit for history since I imagine you have difficultly even getting the thoughts typed out. The great mod circle jerk must be incredibly fantastic for so many of you to be apart of it.

To be fair this seems a more appropriate place for it.

Just because someone claims “The cow jumps over the moon” doesn’t mean the history forum is the place for it, even when they indicate it happened in the past.

This is why you got contained in oot. You are so easily sidetracked. There is no chance I could have ridden everything you posted in the last two days because of the sheer volume, so it must be stuff you have put together over a long period of time.

I’m not sure I am agreeing with your central premise that we had pre existing cities. My feedback though, is you need to work on editing your materials down to only the best bits essential to your point. It is a common mistake to think sheer volume will solidify an argument. In this case it just muddies and murkies it’s own fluid.

Provide your best single example of your theory (it is a theory / conspiracy and not history at this point) and don’t overload it. Push a strong singular example of your premise then use feedback and discourse. Honestly nobody is reading all that, I read way more than probably almost anyone else and I am telling you nobody is reading all that.

If nobody reads it there is no point in posting it let alone complaining about where moderators move it. Prepare your strongest example with your strongest evidence. Maybe a few paragraphs and any actual pictures that are real supporting evidence. Then maybe you will get some people to actually read it and respond. I’m going to tell you up front if people do read ut, because you make it readable, and respond, they may not lavish you with kudos and praise. You should be prepared for that and/or silence.

The most ridiculous of many ridiculous things bigot is posting is how easy it is to find direct evidence explaining all of the things that he's saying are "inconceivable" actually being done at the time. There are extant construction reports on most of those buildings that "couldn't possibly have been built in the 19th century," for example.

Thanks for the feedback. You provided the most honestly abysmal account of how the average 2p2er treats my content. But at least you took the time to write out why you think my style of presenting material is difficult for you to comprehend.

If you dont think that research has been done you're a chump so go ahead and post the direct evidence!

Not going to feed your delusion. I am ready for "faking newspaper articles from the 1800s is easy."

Research doesn't mean what you think it means.

Maybe role playing games can help? By that I mean, if the evidence is observable, the best it can do is be presented. However, when building your own worlds, you not only get to decide all the evidence and how it fits, you can change all around at will. And it’s more satisfying than arguing about what may be observable, but may be beyond the range to fully sense.

My hunch is that science fiction and fantasy were invented long before those became literary categories, perhaps long before printed language of sorts appeared. It’s certainly imaginable and there is stuff to observe. Storytellers are in and out of limits.

I was given this on the strip this week. I thought it was going to be one of those "Girls direct to you" cards. He did not look nuts. Moo?

Damn, I went there looking for an answer to "Why lie?" and got, "Because the powers that be don't want you to know the truth!"

Had a lengthy conversation with a legit flat earth "rep" a few months ago in Berkeley CA and led him to believe that I was both kind of dumb (the alcohol assisted me in this role) and that I was starting to believe in the mantra.

This is a business and they're making money. It was clear that the man speaking to me did not believe that the earth was flat. There is a much different presentation when someone is selling an idea to a moron versus a bat **** crazy guy believing in a conspiracy.

What was he trying to sell? Curious.

In Berkeley?

Gosh!

Seems like maps are the perfect product for flat earthers. Can’t anticipate they’d sell globes, huh?

https://www.google.com/search?q=flat...w=1243&bih=599

Interesting stuff w the mud slides and flat earth will look into this

Lizard People With David Icke and Eddie Bravo
. . .

Please describe/explain how the Foucault pendulum fits the criteria of a scientific experiment

No. We will play this right! YOU define what is a scientific experiment according to your standards and then we can continue. If i agree we can continue.