Just solved a long time problem of "General model to extract premium if market shows any slight deviation from random walk?" . Funny thing, it's similar to a paper I once read that I can't remember what it's called or where it is.
This one has a bunch of science stuff, likely for copyright reasons. Not to be harsh, but it is a song by a band no one has heard of that is better than 74% of the stuff in this thread.
Actually, I am tempted to make an SMP post about objectivity vs subjectivity in aesthetics. People talk almost uniformly in the language of objective aesthetics and then turn to mush as soon as they are questioned because "everyone knows"aesthetics is subjective. That is damn lazy. Aesthetics is more objective than people think.
Also, for those that fetishize economics, aesthetic value is either objective or we are fooling ourselves to an extent that makes even a limited theory of **** economics nearly absurd.
Why does this forum have some decent science content but the philosophy content more often than not sucks?
I have been highly negligent of this thread and enjoyed all the responses. All-In Flynn got no love despite being thoughtful and funny. Mymymymy Sharona.
I am (deep down) a kind and thoughtful member of our little corner of the internet, but if this is the sort of song you like, perhaps it is best if you just go back to drinking heavily. Despite the hype, sometimes a mind is a wonderful thing to waste.
I am (deep down) a kind and thoughtful member of our little corner of the internet, but if this is the sort of song you like, perhaps it is best if you just go back to drinking heavily. Despite the hype, sometimes a mind is a wonderful thing to waste.
Because of that tendency I will take three shots a week . The other videos I've posted (except maybe for the Lady in Red) don't need chemicals.
This was once voted the best musical video ever on MTV. Maybe not very far from the truth. You don't need any mind expanders after this.