Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
this is a really strange response. of all people, 13balls is the only one capable of doing a poor job of defending your indoctrination?
Maybe. Maybe the only one who C(for can)BF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
its called social science. nothing about it is scientific. its unscientific ideology. the content is absurd. there is no debate or skepticism in social sciences about papers like this.
Papers like this are rare. By nature, they draw negative attention.
Deservedly.
Over-generalizing about social science based on rare pieces of crap like this is quite common unfortunately.
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
whats your take on the cited trans athlete situation for example?
My take?
The article is not representative of
good social science or social science in general.
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
why would you ask me what its like to be a contrarian? SJW social "sciences" are the contrarians trying to claim mainstream biology are wrong (among other things). they have even invented their own anthropology. how indoctrinated do you need to be to jump on board the social construct train?
Pretty indoctrinated. About 8 years of education and lots of debt indoctrinated.
What about yourself? How long did you need to be indoctrinated by nitwits on the interwebs?
Quote:
Originally Posted by juan valdez
is it tough socially? why? how? are you just lashing out because a lack of an argument has made you emotional? this also makes no sense. the archetypal SJW is in a constant state of outrage and bitterness. You live in a massive bubble if you think normal people paying attention to the SJW nonsense aren't subtly rolling their eyes like watching the neighbors brat kid at their super sweet 16
Hardly outraged. Mainly curious. Contrarians tend to have it tough, socially.