Quote:
Originally Posted by jbouton
He seems like he wants to explain the theory of evolution with intelligent design.
I don't want to bias you but i can't resist. And also i likely won't.
imo that's where this leads as i feared/got excited about. He's clever to let you jump there if you so wish and not jump to it himself. All he needs is **** tons of
seemingly novel scientific evidence that is testable, today, which he has.
Evolution is the undertone if you notice and mentioned when reasonable with intelligence being demonstrated to exist and convincingly so over say random mutations being selected for when suited to environment that we may all have heard.
Which to me, is precisely the crux of evolution being made out a mere random process that then leads to intelligence later on in brains of animals.
intelligence being defined as the ability to reach the same goal by various means.
i should have actually put some effort into researching a should be simple process but id rather wing it and look ignorant at this point.
I recall Daniel Dennet was mentioned earlier.