Quote:
Originally Posted by PairTheBoard
I know practically nothing about how they have carried out hot hand research. You seem to know something about it. Can you describe the specifics of a method they have used where the paper is relevant and would significantly inform the results?
PairTheBoard
I am pretty sure that we (smp) discussed it the last go-around about this specific paper. If I remember correctly, at least one of us was willing to actually read the paper, and that person was also willing to quote the relevant part(s) of the paper that discussed the research you are asking me to find within the paper that has been linked to several times in this iteration of the discussion of the paper.
I don't believe that person was me, since it doesn't seem like something I would do. But you never know.
It is possible that I am remembering another discussion of the paper (the one we are talking about) though, in which case it is still the case that the paper does supply citations for research that was done without taking into account or correcting for the statistical artifact that the paper is about.
Perhaps someone more industrious than me will reread the paper and copy and paste the relevant passages. Of course, this person could just state that the relevant passages begin just after the first paragraph of the introduction and let you work it out from there, if they were feeling slightly under the weather upon realizing that they were being asked to read a paper for someone else.