Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
163 163

04-12-2020 , 09:06 PM
This number came up as a prime factor of 3749 in something I was doing. I saw where a mathematician called it, 163, his most fascinating number. Something about it being the first number in some arcane series of expanded primes and the last number in another one. Way over my head on the math, no mathematician here. Anybody know what he is referring to and can put it in non-mathematical terms?
163 Quote
04-13-2020 , 12:50 PM
Thanks. Did he mean every integer can be factored by primes?
163 Quote
04-13-2020 , 06:51 PM
yes, and always in a unique manner
163 Quote
04-13-2020 , 08:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Morphismus
yes, and always in a unique manner
Unless 1 is a prime number
163 Quote
04-13-2020 , 08:48 PM
Which it isn't.

Although 0 is an integer.
163 Quote
04-13-2020 , 09:48 PM
1 ought be a prime number. It would reduce the number of conjectures, which, I think we can all agree, would be nice
163 Quote
04-13-2020 , 09:50 PM
Edit: alternatively, it would increase the length of some conjectures and make them sound sillier, which would also be nice
163 Quote
04-13-2020 , 10:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianTheMick2
1 ought be a prime number. It would reduce the number of conjectures, which, I think we can all agree, would be nice
It would make a lot of theorems far more annoying to state (or false).
163 Quote
04-14-2020 , 04:27 AM
So, basically, no downside at all
163 Quote
04-14-2020 , 01:44 PM
Is there a proof 1 is not a prime number?, based on the axiom/definition of a prime? I don’t think so. It is just stated so*, that way there is less to get tripped up on for the whole number system.

*see Plato if you have any doubts. Plus you can’t have the house of cards known as the integers collapse into chaos.

Last edited by Zeno; 04-14-2020 at 01:49 PM. Reason: Added text
163 Quote
04-14-2020 , 01:52 PM
It is against the law to divide by the integer 0. So saith The Lord!
163 Quote
04-16-2020 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeno
Is there a proof 1 is not a prime number?, based on the axiom/definition of a prime? I don’t think so. It is just stated so*, that way there is less to get tripped up on for the whole number system.

*see Plato if you have any doubts. Plus you can’t have the house of cards known as the integers collapse into chaos.
It's a deeply important* semantic debate about the meaning of the word 'and' in the usual definition.

*It's what I call a 5 pinter (6 in american money)
163 Quote
04-16-2020 , 01:37 AM
Theorem
1 is an even number

proof:
1 is divisible by 1 and 1
1 and 1 is 2

therefore
1 is divisible by 2

Thus 1 is an even number
qed


PairTheBoard
163 Quote
04-16-2020 , 01:56 AM
That is odd

Hence 1 is both even and odd

qed
163 Quote

      
m