Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT

04-25-2013 , 02:00 PM
maybe iggy was projecting the draft order and not power rankings when he had 4. Eagles.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:00 PM
people who hate on iggy dont understand sports betting. Also Seadood not being discussed as a decent pick are people that dont read TZ or especially the Lol Lakers thread. IMO the truly worst posters are the people that dont try to suck and still do. Too many self aware trolls selected.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:01 PM
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JumanjiBoard
people who hate on iggy dont understand sports betting. Also Seadood not being discussed as a decent pick are people that dont read TZ or especially the Lol Lakers thread. IMO the truly worst posters are the people that dont try to suck and still do. Too many self aware trolls selected.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:06 PM
Thremp was pretty high on my board. Even though he was frequently "right," he was still an awful poster. He failed at very basic reading comprehension and writing, which made any argument involving him a tilting trainwreck imo -- people would just go in circles and Thremp would insult them and use some goofy meme-type language until someone got banned.

Of course, he was an effective heel which made it satisfying when a babyface like Diablo beat up on him. I suppose that might add some value.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BAIDS
oh right yeah im used to operating on GMT, annie's got about 30 mins left (skipped at 12:52 foarum time)
You know you change the time to GMT.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:16 PM
I skyped with Jetto while playing LoL with him last week. If he isn't real then someone is an amazing actor. Nice guy. Sounds exactly like you'd expect.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:19 PM
is jetto still banned? does he have a new alias if yes?
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by A-Rod's Cousin
lol Chilltown taking 2 good posters, and with no write-up. I'll do a proper write-up of myself later tonight. I will try to go into the archives back to posts that date back to 2004 on previous accounts. With a little work, I can frame my posts such that they make me look like a bad poster.
yeah that should be quite the struggle
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:28 PM
that's the jopke
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:33 PM
i guess it was him calling himself a good poster in the first sentence that threw me off although i suppose that could have been a joke too.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaid_Ahmed
Last I mention on spascwoc but very telling that "undrafted" only lasted 31 posts before giving up on him
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:44 PM
There are times in our lives when coincidence brings opportunity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Seriously, agdci not nearly as bad as this thread making him out. He made good points, just went a little overboard sometimes. But you gotta admire his stamina in defending his position.
This is one of those times.

RacersEdge has been lingering on our draft board, and is part of the reason we traded down. Now that fortune has struck, I must tackle the daunting task of summarizing his terrible posting. He has posted in more than 250 SE threads, and therefore his volume of work makes him a highly valuable selection. In addition, he is another LOL STEELERS homer. He can therefore be counted on to interact with Systolic and agdci981 in painful and infuriating ways. I delight at the thought of reading the inevitable Big Ben vs. Matt Ryan debate that would ignite the moment these star-crossed morons found each other. By selecting RacersEdge, we have selected an ardent PSU and Joe Paterno defender on the level of Bdidd, with the added value of additional horrible p0sting.

RacersEdge Defended Penn State, Penn State Football, and Joe Paterno

First, we start with the obvious: RacersEdge is the only poster who rivaled Bdidd in pretentious, annoying, idiotic, unsupportable yet entirely genuine defense of Penn State, Penn State Football, and Joe Paterno.

I present, in my personal opinion, his greatest hit:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
yeah, do people actually believe something like this was much more likely at PSU than any other school that worships sports? This is the "they got just happened to get caught" scenario.
Yes, because football programs are raping little boys all over the nation, institutionalized head coaches are blessing that depravity, and every university is carrying out cost-benefit analyses that save football programs by sacrificing the mental, physical and sexual health of children. It sucks when your number gets pulled in such a broad lottery.

You are an absolute imbecile.

Unfortunately for all of us (but fortunately for this draft), there's so much more and it's all so terrible.

Racers engaged in his sneaky defense of PSU well after JoePa had been fired:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
just heard a summary of this FBI report on NPR an hour ago, and it sounded like a lot of handwaving - PSU "needed a more efficient organization", "needed an environment of accountability", etc, etc. Do they have anything more concrete?
A poster provided a transcript of a conversation he was having with a girl on facebook regarding the Freeh Report's statements about JoePa's knowledge, as early as 2001, that Sandusky used PSU facilities to rape children. In the transcript the girl explained that "old people forget things" and that "JoePa told the truth." The 2+2 poster expressed his tilt at the cultish acceptance that JoePa can do no wrong, and Racers was there to run with it:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
I don't know what is tilt inducing about her response - this is what a defense attorney would say if they were defending JP.

also, I wonder how much differently this kind of thing would go down at other schools of PSU caliber - do they all have "efficient organization" as the Free report wants - do they all have the mechanisms in place to adhere to the Clery standards (at least before 11/2011)? I doubt it.
Because defense attorneys are good role models for reasonable responses to probably (certainly?) true accusations.

Here's a troubling exchange that has stuck in my mind for almost a full year:

Quote:
Originally Posted by diddy!
Innocent until proven guilty standard only applies to courts, which he has abdicated power from by dying before he could be punished.

The court of public opinion has much, much lesser standards.

Also, let's just say one of Spanier, Curley, or Schultz decides to flip to avoid punishment, and produces evidence that directly implicates Paterno. Or Sandusky decides to bare his soul to the world about JoePa's knowledge in a televised jailhouse interview with Katie Couric. Won't the knock then be they are trying to save his own skin, and/or just throwing a dead man under the bus? I mean if you don't want to blame Paterno, that's cool, you just have to live in a world where the vast majority of people think you are a ******. There is no more smoking gun coming that you or others would be okay with. So we'll just further entrench into our positions where one side thinks JoePa was a saint and the other side thinks JoePa was a child-rape enabler. I really don't see how anything will change because I don't see anything come to light that fills that gap, or anything being inherently trusted by the JoePa loyalists if it does come to light.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
that's the point - some people are going to stick with the higher standards
Quote:
Originally Posted by diddy!
the higher standards that cannot be met because of death. how convenient.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
You are crazy if you think it's a "reasonable" position to say JoePa didn't do anything until proven guilty.

It's a possible position. It's also obviously wrong.

There's a difference between holding differing "reasonable" positions, and holding opinions so poorly constructed and so undeserving of consideration that you reveal yourself to be an incompetent by holding them.

Racers, you are doing the latter.

EDIT: It's almost like you don't understand that reasonable and "remotely possible" are different levels of justification for a belief.

EDIT2: Put differently, reasonable minds can certainly differ. Sadly for you, not every difference of opinion arises when two reasonable minds disagree. Often someone is just plainly wrong. Then it's funny, or dangerous if that person happens to somehow matter. Sarah Palin is a nice example of this.
^ Not my best moment with the Palin reference. Racers managed to RUSTLE me with his ongoing stupidity.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
...

RE's position is essentially this: because a conviction based on a reasonable doubt standard will not be had (because JoePa is dead), it is reasonable to say he did nothing wrong. Just mull that over.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
idk what you are getting so pissed off about - you used "lesser standards" so I used the opposite - I could have said "some people are not content using lesser standards to make a decision". better?
Makes me furious.

Here's a fantastic p0st from July, 2012 (apparently my point was not well made):

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
a lot of psu fans will continue to not condemn paterno as long as there is not hard evidence that implicates him. the freeh report raises a lot of serious questions, but doesn't answer them. as long as that gap exists, it will be a reasonable position to say paterno is still innocent until proven guilty.
He doubled down on implying that the Freeh Report was unreliable because Freeh had an incentive to take down PSU (he was not paid on contingency).

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loretta8
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Kind of amateurish, but it does touch on a few good high level points i thought might come out. Freeh did have an incentive to "get" someone rather than explain the situation. Good stuff about 1 janitor = entire psu culture too.
Note that "kind of amateurish" is stated only to provide Racers with a thin veneer of reasonability. Not only is he an idiot and a defender of rapists, but he's also somewhat-skilled in the arts of INTERNET CAMOUFLAGE.

Here's more, in which PSU is just like every other univeristy, their response was fine, and (post-firing) there's still no evidence against Joe Paterno:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
are you trying for a "results oriented" response?

I'm saying put 50 Sanduskys at 50 schools in the same capacity and how many schools competely handle the situation correctly?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
[longass cult post from blackshoediaries.com about how unreliable the Freeh Report is]
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Plus, is this comment correct about the total findings againt J P

Does anyone know of more information in the Freeh report implicating Joe than this:
Some say Freeh proved Joe Paterno was very aware of the 1998 investigation because he was mentioned in two emais
The mention by Curley that after he met with Joe in 2001 he had reconsidered the plan after speaking with Joe to notify the Second Mile and CYS and he wanted to get with Sandusky first?

Has anyone found something other than these things said by Curley that implicate Joe in anything?


Is there more than ths against JP?
85-year-old Bill James, at some point, came out in defense of Joe Paterno. RacersEdge posted "finally some logic, thank you Bill James," and followed up with this gem:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Which parts was he confused on? He seemed to really just weigh the facts correctly without becoming emotional especially not layering "omg paterno controlled every aspect of activity on campus, football related or not", like gotleib was screaming.
Here, our prize horse defends Penn State by deduction, inferring that since PSU didn't look bad at all by 2001 they would have outed Sandusky if they actually knew. He is clever enough to not outright say "and therefore PSU never knew," but the implication is clear:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
This is the part that still makes no sense - they really don't look bad at all - there is a tangible investigative report showing the conclusions - probably has a life span on the news of 48 hours. So option A is say "now we have more evidence we didn't have in 1998", and option B is "let's begin a massive institution-wide cover-up" - and they choose B??
Yep, they chose B, which was obvious well before you made this post.

More denial:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
solid points on a hand-waving report. PSU should take the line that they will wait until the trials of the top guys are over to draw any conclusions - where conclusions are based on facts and evidence - and all this speculation can be called just that by the defense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Of course i think there was a crime and probably a coverup, but JPs role is still very questionable if you start from anything close to innocent until proven guilty Did you read this link? http://onwardstate.com/community/con...-big-problems/

I mean the gaps and holes are pretty obvious - i'm not using some legal loophole or something. JP may be involved in a coverup, but lets see something more concrete than speculation before he is labeled a monster. The reports logic is "theres a puddle on the floor, an ice cube must have melted"- but there are other ways a puddle can be created.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Lol, i'm from pittsburgh so really i should be leading this witch hunt, but i guess my objectivism gets in the way.
Christ.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Or was he a 75 yo man who took 3 naps a day and wasnt following anything not directly related to his football program?
Gotta preserve those wins:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
It does look very self-serving to want 2 wins to disappear as punishment.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Has a school ever vacated wins due to non-sport related behavoir? Just seems so random. Are they going to force them to have their endzones turf depict the pedo bear too?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
vacating wins is pretty lol

and why did they go back to 1998 and not 2001 when the administration really should have known what was going on according to mr freeh?
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
And criminal punishment such as fines and jail time won't get their attention?

If I worked for a company and I was about to do something illegal to help protect the company's reputation and the consequences if I were caught were A) I go to jail for 10 years and B) company's stock prices drops by 30%, A would influence a lot more than B.
Gotta preserve the football program:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Come on this is a complex issue...wasnt even clear ncaa had any jurisdiction anyway and not punishing too much so many not tied to any of this is a reasonable line. You cant just have a simpleton "nuke everybody" policy.
I have no idea what this means, but whatever the implication is, I am highly confident it is hilarious:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slighted
There should be an uproar if that is the case.. raping children for two decades just two times as bad as giving Reggie bush a house..
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
But how many at usc went to prison?
Victim role in August 2012:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
How come no one is going after Second Mile? They seem to have a lot of questions to answer too. Is it just because psu is where the money is?
I've read this several times to try to streamline it for you guys. It makes me absolutely furious. Still.

LOL STEELERS

Let's just get this part over with. He's an annoying Steelers fan.

Quote:
lol @ all the Steeler hate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
with all this hate, 7th ring gonna be so much sweeter
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
This latest steeler hate has been entertaining
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Good post but you have realize many people have mentally snapped here from there steeler hate
Whining about the LOL STEELERS thread in the LOL STEELERS thread, a CAPITAL OFFENSE:

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
people can't possibly still be entertained by this thread - time for a lock imo.
Quote:
Originally Posted by areaman
Spoiler:
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Lol, Like the steelers had no injuries
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Lol, you guys are easily amused
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
the hardest hitters that blitz a lot are gonna be violent and dangerous - shocking.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Cheering for injuries now? This thread really attracts the class of the internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
there are some mad little chimps itt
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Has any team had more "BS defensive penalty assisted" TDs against them than pittsburgh the last 2 years? They have to be around 30.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
In terms of loyalty, knowledge, and class, Steeler fans are the GOAT...and there is really not a close second.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
lol SE mods
He's Also Generally Terrible

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
I hate that thug Dorsey.
Talking about Joey Dorsey.

Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Somebody at least put some pressure on this thug
Talking about Angel Cabrera (lol wat).

A Final Point

In looking through his voluminous posting, I was hit by a revelation. He posts in game-day threads, where his posts are almost universally ignored. None of them are funny.

He posts about rape and gets it wrong.

He posts about the LOL STEELERS and gets mocked, and trolls poorly when the LOL STEELERS win.

But, in all my searching, I was unable to find a single post - 250+ threads - that contained actual content that was not ridiculous or annoying. With this guy, you get worthless but voluminous when you're extremely lucky, and you get the worst possible AIDS when you're not.

He's horrendous.

*****

Roster:

Systolic
agdci981
RacersEdge
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:49 PM
AMUSING ADDENDUM:

He was first on our board when this happened.

Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
...

[pick agdci]

...
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacersEdge
Seriously, agdci not nearly as bad as this thread making him out. He made good points, just went a little overboard sometimes. But you gotta admire his stamina in defending his position.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:49 PM
you could have just quoted his post from earlier itt where he said agdci is not that bad but this works too.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:51 PM
lolsteelers
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:51 PM
RacersEdge wins

Lock her up
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phildo
you could have just quoted his post from earlier itt where he said agdci is not that bad but this works too.
Not sure if serious.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:51 PM
Phildo
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:52 PM
Assuming given the timestamps that Phildo was typing that out when Hoya made his addendum post.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:53 PM
It's actually the first quote in the actual write-up, as well.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chim17
Not sure if serious.
we made those posts at the same time.

edit:
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
It's actually the first quote in the actual write-up, as well.
lol oops

Last edited by Phildo; 04-25-2013 at 02:55 PM. Reason: gotta do some skimming with posts these long
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:55 PM
Still, I think including the full RacersEdge archives meets the 'innocent until proven guilty' mantra that he adheres to
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 02:55 PM
hoya and steroid boy crushing this draft. anarchist and chilltown competing for last.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-25-2013 , 03:03 PM
Wow, what a write up. I have no idea how this is possible but I didn't even know who that guy was until now. Based on the write up he's top 5 material.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote

      
m