Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT
04-25-2013
, 02:00 PM
maybe iggy was projecting the draft order and not power rankings when he had 4. Eagles.
04-25-2013
, 02:00 PM
people who hate on iggy dont understand sports betting. Also Seadood not being discussed as a decent pick are people that dont read TZ or especially the Lol Lakers thread. IMO the truly worst posters are the people that dont try to suck and still do. Too many self aware trolls selected.
04-25-2013
, 02:01 PM
04-25-2013
, 02:03 PM
Quote:
people who hate on iggy dont understand sports betting. Also Seadood not being discussed as a decent pick are people that dont read TZ or especially the Lol Lakers thread. IMO the truly worst posters are the people that dont try to suck and still do. Too many self aware trolls selected.

04-25-2013
, 02:06 PM
Thremp was pretty high on my board. Even though he was frequently "right," he was still an awful poster. He failed at very basic reading comprehension and writing, which made any argument involving him a tilting trainwreck imo -- people would just go in circles and Thremp would insult them and use some goofy meme-type language until someone got banned.
Of course, he was an effective heel which made it satisfying when a babyface like Diablo beat up on him. I suppose that might add some value.
Of course, he was an effective heel which made it satisfying when a babyface like Diablo beat up on him. I suppose that might add some value.
04-25-2013
, 02:11 PM
You know you change the time to GMT.
04-25-2013
, 02:16 PM
I skyped with Jetto while playing LoL with him last week. If he isn't real then someone is an amazing actor. Nice guy. Sounds exactly like you'd expect.
04-25-2013
, 02:19 PM
is jetto still banned? does he have a new alias if yes?
04-25-2013
, 02:26 PM
Quote:
lol Chilltown taking 2 good posters, and with no write-up. I'll do a proper write-up of myself later tonight. I will try to go into the archives back to posts that date back to 2004 on previous accounts. With a little work, I can frame my posts such that they make me look like a bad poster.
04-25-2013
, 02:28 PM
that's the jopke
04-25-2013
, 02:33 PM
i guess it was him calling himself a good poster in the first sentence that threw me off although i suppose that could have been a joke too.
04-25-2013
, 02:44 PM
There are times in our lives when coincidence brings opportunity.
This is one of those times.
RacersEdge has been lingering on our draft board, and is part of the reason we traded down. Now that fortune has struck, I must tackle the daunting task of summarizing his terrible posting. He has posted in more than 250 SE threads, and therefore his volume of work makes him a highly valuable selection. In addition, he is another LOL STEELERS homer. He can therefore be counted on to interact with Systolic and agdci981 in painful and infuriating ways. I delight at the thought of reading the inevitable Big Ben vs. Matt Ryan debate that would ignite the moment these star-crossed morons found each other. By selecting RacersEdge, we have selected an ardent PSU and Joe Paterno defender on the level of Bdidd, with the added value of additional horrible p0sting.
RacersEdge Defended Penn State, Penn State Football, and Joe Paterno
First, we start with the obvious: RacersEdge is the only poster who rivaled Bdidd in pretentious, annoying, idiotic, unsupportable yet entirely genuine defense of Penn State, Penn State Football, and Joe Paterno.
I present, in my personal opinion, his greatest hit:
Yes, because football programs are raping little boys all over the nation, institutionalized head coaches are blessing that depravity, and every university is carrying out cost-benefit analyses that save football programs by sacrificing the mental, physical and sexual health of children. It sucks when your number gets pulled in such a broad lottery.
You are an absolute imbecile.
Unfortunately for all of us (but fortunately for this draft), there's so much more and it's all so terrible.
Racers engaged in his sneaky defense of PSU well after JoePa had been fired:
A poster provided a transcript of a conversation he was having with a girl on facebook regarding the Freeh Report's statements about JoePa's knowledge, as early as 2001, that Sandusky used PSU facilities to rape children. In the transcript the girl explained that "old people forget things" and that "JoePa told the truth." The 2+2 poster expressed his tilt at the cultish acceptance that JoePa can do no wrong, and Racers was there to run with it:
Because defense attorneys are good role models for reasonable responses to probably (certainly?) true accusations.
Here's a troubling exchange that has stuck in my mind for almost a full year:
^ Not my best moment with the Palin reference. Racers managed to RUSTLE me with his ongoing stupidity.
Makes me furious.
Here's a fantastic p0st from July, 2012 (apparently my point was not well made):
He doubled down on implying that the Freeh Report was unreliable because Freeh had an incentive to take down PSU (he was not paid on contingency).
Note that "kind of amateurish" is stated only to provide Racers with a thin veneer of reasonability. Not only is he an idiot and a defender of rapists, but he's also somewhat-skilled in the arts of INTERNET CAMOUFLAGE.
Here's more, in which PSU is just like every other univeristy, their response was fine, and (post-firing) there's still no evidence against Joe Paterno:
85-year-old Bill James, at some point, came out in defense of Joe Paterno. RacersEdge posted "finally some logic, thank you Bill James," and followed up with this gem:
Here, our prize horse defends Penn State by deduction, inferring that since PSU didn't look bad at all by 2001 they would have outed Sandusky if they actually knew. He is clever enough to not outright say "and therefore PSU never knew," but the implication is clear:
Yep, they chose B, which was obvious well before you made this post.
More denial:
Christ.
Gotta preserve those wins:
Gotta preserve the football program:
I have no idea what this means, but whatever the implication is, I am highly confident it is hilarious:
Victim role in August 2012:
I've read this several times to try to streamline it for you guys. It makes me absolutely furious. Still.
LOL STEELERS
Let's just get this part over with. He's an annoying Steelers fan.
Whining about the LOL STEELERS thread in the LOL STEELERS thread, a CAPITAL OFFENSE:
He's Also Generally Terrible
Talking about Joey Dorsey.
Talking about Angel Cabrera (lol wat).
A Final Point
In looking through his voluminous posting, I was hit by a revelation. He posts in game-day threads, where his posts are almost universally ignored. None of them are funny.
He posts about rape and gets it wrong.
He posts about the LOL STEELERS and gets mocked, and trolls poorly when the LOL STEELERS win.
But, in all my searching, I was unable to find a single post - 250+ threads - that contained actual content that was not ridiculous or annoying. With this guy, you get worthless but voluminous when you're extremely lucky, and you get the worst possible AIDS when you're not.
He's horrendous.
*****
Roster:
Systolic
agdci981
RacersEdge
RacersEdge has been lingering on our draft board, and is part of the reason we traded down. Now that fortune has struck, I must tackle the daunting task of summarizing his terrible posting. He has posted in more than 250 SE threads, and therefore his volume of work makes him a highly valuable selection. In addition, he is another LOL STEELERS homer. He can therefore be counted on to interact with Systolic and agdci981 in painful and infuriating ways. I delight at the thought of reading the inevitable Big Ben vs. Matt Ryan debate that would ignite the moment these star-crossed morons found each other. By selecting RacersEdge, we have selected an ardent PSU and Joe Paterno defender on the level of Bdidd, with the added value of additional horrible p0sting.
RacersEdge Defended Penn State, Penn State Football, and Joe Paterno
First, we start with the obvious: RacersEdge is the only poster who rivaled Bdidd in pretentious, annoying, idiotic, unsupportable yet entirely genuine defense of Penn State, Penn State Football, and Joe Paterno.
I present, in my personal opinion, his greatest hit:
You are an absolute imbecile.
Unfortunately for all of us (but fortunately for this draft), there's so much more and it's all so terrible.
Racers engaged in his sneaky defense of PSU well after JoePa had been fired:
Quote:
I don't know what is tilt inducing about her response - this is what a defense attorney would say if they were defending JP.
also, I wonder how much differently this kind of thing would go down at other schools of PSU caliber - do they all have "efficient organization" as the Free report wants - do they all have the mechanisms in place to adhere to the Clery standards (at least before 11/2011)? I doubt it.
also, I wonder how much differently this kind of thing would go down at other schools of PSU caliber - do they all have "efficient organization" as the Free report wants - do they all have the mechanisms in place to adhere to the Clery standards (at least before 11/2011)? I doubt it.
Here's a troubling exchange that has stuck in my mind for almost a full year:
Quote:
Innocent until proven guilty standard only applies to courts, which he has abdicated power from by dying before he could be punished.
The court of public opinion has much, much lesser standards.
Also, let's just say one of Spanier, Curley, or Schultz decides to flip to avoid punishment, and produces evidence that directly implicates Paterno. Or Sandusky decides to bare his soul to the world about JoePa's knowledge in a televised jailhouse interview with Katie Couric. Won't the knock then be they are trying to save his own skin, and/or just throwing a dead man under the bus? I mean if you don't want to blame Paterno, that's cool, you just have to live in a world where the vast majority of people think you are a ******. There is no more smoking gun coming that you or others would be okay with. So we'll just further entrench into our positions where one side thinks JoePa was a saint and the other side thinks JoePa was a child-rape enabler. I really don't see how anything will change because I don't see anything come to light that fills that gap, or anything being inherently trusted by the JoePa loyalists if it does come to light.
The court of public opinion has much, much lesser standards.
Also, let's just say one of Spanier, Curley, or Schultz decides to flip to avoid punishment, and produces evidence that directly implicates Paterno. Or Sandusky decides to bare his soul to the world about JoePa's knowledge in a televised jailhouse interview with Katie Couric. Won't the knock then be they are trying to save his own skin, and/or just throwing a dead man under the bus? I mean if you don't want to blame Paterno, that's cool, you just have to live in a world where the vast majority of people think you are a ******. There is no more smoking gun coming that you or others would be okay with. So we'll just further entrench into our positions where one side thinks JoePa was a saint and the other side thinks JoePa was a child-rape enabler. I really don't see how anything will change because I don't see anything come to light that fills that gap, or anything being inherently trusted by the JoePa loyalists if it does come to light.
Quote:
You are crazy if you think it's a "reasonable" position to say JoePa didn't do anything until proven guilty.
It's a possible position. It's also obviously wrong.
There's a difference between holding differing "reasonable" positions, and holding opinions so poorly constructed and so undeserving of consideration that you reveal yourself to be an incompetent by holding them.
Racers, you are doing the latter.
EDIT: It's almost like you don't understand that reasonable and "remotely possible" are different levels of justification for a belief.
EDIT2: Put differently, reasonable minds can certainly differ. Sadly for you, not every difference of opinion arises when two reasonable minds disagree. Often someone is just plainly wrong. Then it's funny, or dangerous if that person happens to somehow matter. Sarah Palin is a nice example of this.
It's a possible position. It's also obviously wrong.
There's a difference between holding differing "reasonable" positions, and holding opinions so poorly constructed and so undeserving of consideration that you reveal yourself to be an incompetent by holding them.
Racers, you are doing the latter.
EDIT: It's almost like you don't understand that reasonable and "remotely possible" are different levels of justification for a belief.
EDIT2: Put differently, reasonable minds can certainly differ. Sadly for you, not every difference of opinion arises when two reasonable minds disagree. Often someone is just plainly wrong. Then it's funny, or dangerous if that person happens to somehow matter. Sarah Palin is a nice example of this.
Here's a fantastic p0st from July, 2012 (apparently my point was not well made):
Quote:
a lot of psu fans will continue to not condemn paterno as long as there is not hard evidence that implicates him. the freeh report raises a lot of serious questions, but doesn't answer them. as long as that gap exists, it will be a reasonable position to say paterno is still innocent until proven guilty.
Quote:
Here's more, in which PSU is just like every other univeristy, their response was fine, and (post-firing) there's still no evidence against Joe Paterno:
Quote:
Plus, is this comment correct about the total findings againt J P
Does anyone know of more information in the Freeh report implicating Joe than this:
Some say Freeh proved Joe Paterno was very aware of the 1998 investigation because he was mentioned in two emais
The mention by Curley that after he met with Joe in 2001 he had reconsidered the plan after speaking with Joe to notify the Second Mile and CYS and he wanted to get with Sandusky first?
Has anyone found something other than these things said by Curley that implicate Joe in anything?
Is there more than ths against JP?
Does anyone know of more information in the Freeh report implicating Joe than this:
Some say Freeh proved Joe Paterno was very aware of the 1998 investigation because he was mentioned in two emais
The mention by Curley that after he met with Joe in 2001 he had reconsidered the plan after speaking with Joe to notify the Second Mile and CYS and he wanted to get with Sandusky first?
Has anyone found something other than these things said by Curley that implicate Joe in anything?
Is there more than ths against JP?
Quote:
This is the part that still makes no sense - they really don't look bad at all - there is a tangible investigative report showing the conclusions - probably has a life span on the news of 48 hours. So option A is say "now we have more evidence we didn't have in 1998", and option B is "let's begin a massive institution-wide cover-up" - and they choose B??
More denial:
Quote:
Quote:
Of course i think there was a crime and probably a coverup, but JPs role is still very questionable if you start from anything close to innocent until proven guilty Did you read this link? http://onwardstate.com/community/con...-big-problems/
I mean the gaps and holes are pretty obvious - i'm not using some legal loophole or something. JP may be involved in a coverup, but lets see something more concrete than speculation before he is labeled a monster. The reports logic is "theres a puddle on the floor, an ice cube must have melted"- but there are other ways a puddle can be created.
I mean the gaps and holes are pretty obvious - i'm not using some legal loophole or something. JP may be involved in a coverup, but lets see something more concrete than speculation before he is labeled a monster. The reports logic is "theres a puddle on the floor, an ice cube must have melted"- but there are other ways a puddle can be created.
Quote:
And criminal punishment such as fines and jail time won't get their attention?
If I worked for a company and I was about to do something illegal to help protect the company's reputation and the consequences if I were caught were A) I go to jail for 10 years and B) company's stock prices drops by 30%, A would influence a lot more than B.
If I worked for a company and I was about to do something illegal to help protect the company's reputation and the consequences if I were caught were A) I go to jail for 10 years and B) company's stock prices drops by 30%, A would influence a lot more than B.
LOL STEELERS
Let's just get this part over with. He's an annoying Steelers fan.
Quote:
lol @ all the Steeler hate.
Talking about Joey Dorsey.
Talking about Angel Cabrera (lol wat).
A Final Point
In looking through his voluminous posting, I was hit by a revelation. He posts in game-day threads, where his posts are almost universally ignored. None of them are funny.
He posts about rape and gets it wrong.
He posts about the LOL STEELERS and gets mocked, and trolls poorly when the LOL STEELERS win.
But, in all my searching, I was unable to find a single post - 250+ threads - that contained actual content that was not ridiculous or annoying. With this guy, you get worthless but voluminous when you're extremely lucky, and you get the worst possible AIDS when you're not.
He's horrendous.
*****
Roster:
Systolic
agdci981
RacersEdge
04-25-2013
, 02:49 PM
AMUSING ADDENDUM:
He was first on our board when this happened.
He was first on our board when this happened.
04-25-2013
, 02:49 PM
you could have just quoted his post from earlier itt where he said agdci is not that bad but this works too.
04-25-2013
, 02:51 PM
lolsteelers
04-25-2013
, 02:51 PM
RacersEdge wins
Lock her up
Lock her up
04-25-2013
, 02:51 PM
Snowboarding concerts and punk music
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 56,127
Not sure if serious.
04-25-2013
, 02:51 PM
Phildo
04-25-2013
, 02:52 PM
Assuming given the timestamps that Phildo was typing that out when Hoya made his addendum post.
04-25-2013
, 02:53 PM
It's actually the first quote in the actual write-up, as well.
04-25-2013
, 02:53 PM
we made those posts at the same time.
edit:
lol oops
edit:
lol oops
Last edited by Phildo; 04-25-2013 at 02:55 PM.
Reason: gotta do some skimming with posts these long
04-25-2013
, 02:55 PM
Still, I think including the full RacersEdge archives meets the 'innocent until proven guilty' mantra that he adheres to
04-25-2013
, 02:55 PM
hoya and steroid boy crushing this draft. anarchist and chilltown competing for last.
04-25-2013
, 03:03 PM
Wow, what a write up. I have no idea how this is possible but I didn't even know who that guy was until now. Based on the write up he's top 5 material.
Feedback is used for internal purposes. LEARN MORE
Powered by:
Hand2Note
Copyright ©2008-2022, Hand2Note Interactive LTD