Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT

04-27-2013 , 03:52 PM
I think Kit was basically just saying he liked a good trainwreck, which is why he mentioned being a fan of RJ/undrafted posters. Guess there is some merit to that, but to do business you eventually have to get the train back on the tracks.

Either that or it's 2p2 EPL thread version of

music was better in the 80s before RADIOHEAD and KE$HA etc
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 03:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Lol at citing "epaulet". Wat.
Yeah, I thought he was taking epaulet, which I was nodding @, although he only has like 5 posts. Each one has been worse than the next.

but taking AIM... wat?
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 03:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PimpingRegs
In my defence I thought that MERICAN QPR fans would be a rarity as well and there are more of them in SE than Manchester City fans!
I think 2 of the QPR fans who are active are not American. IIRC Toke is Singaporean or something like that?
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CalledDownLight
Seems like we just don't allow the type of behaviour that was once tolerated.
It's more like the forum has been populated by a large portion of spineless posters that are afraid of conflict or standing out. They are more inclined to play things safe and craft their responses to he the approval of others. This waters down the forum as posters just blend into each other.

Meanwhile, creativity is quashed.

A good example of this is Tuq. If this forum wasn't so infected, they would realize Tuq is the franchise and would keep him front and center. Tuq is a once-in-a generation talent that has all the tools: not only is he funny; he is smart, has real life experience, and he constantly keeps overlooked posters and opinions in play. He also tore more new buttholes than a proctologist with Parkinson's - or John Holmes during his "I'll do anything for drug money days."

But, the forum has devolved into a group of critics that offer no substantive content and are scared to consider ideas not connected to metrics. Boring. I have no idea how a forum of "+1" posts can be considered interesting or exciting. This place has more eunuchs than the Heavens Gate compound.

Anyhow, you all haven't ruined Tuq, but you are wasting him. Shame on you.

Clark is another example. He was dynamic and bold (like Dr. Pepper 10 claims to be). He stood for something. He put passion in his work - so much so that his glasses would fog up from time to time.

Anyhow, he's been relegated to the corner - he sits there like a potted plant with nothing interesting to offer. You guys did that to him and you should hang your heads in shame. I'd rather take a 100-floor elevator ride with MicroBob than read any of Clark's recent posts. Greatness has been destroyed; there is blood on your hands.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:09 PM
Tuq hasn't let the forum's distaste for homophobia quash his opinion on that matter.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
elevator ride with MicroBob
not enough wall-space
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Horton
Tuq hasn't let the forum's distaste for homophobia quash his opinion on that matter.
Are you saying you honestly believe that Tuq (in real life) is homophobic?

I have no opinion on you (and this is not personal to you) but I can go back 7 or 8 years off the top of my head and remember things Tuq has posted. I can't even go back to this morning on most of you.

It's like the dudes who all where the same striped shirt to the club. You are all high fiving each other while the real men are picking up women (or men - according to taste and preference).
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rei Ayanami
not enough wall-space
Meh, at least you try.

Anyhow, I will be happier once Clark gets his bold flavor back.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski

It's like the dudes who all wear the same striped shirt to the club. You are all high fiving each other while the real men are picking up women (or men - according to taste and preference).
Best clique analogy I've read.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:22 PM
Was heavens hate the ones who thought they were going to hail bop?
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
It's like the dudes who all where the same striped shirt to the club. You are all high fiving each other while the real men are picking up women
lol @ u! i stand out in a crowd and slay, brah

Spoiler:
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
Meh, at least you try.
not in SE, but ty anyway
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:25 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
ppl getting nostalgic for the old AIDS soccer p0sters itt

or else i'm getting leveled hard, in which case

edit: that Tuma post is amazing, lol
You must be nostalgic for the days when Vanilla was the only ice cream and you got 2 television channels.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bdidd
Was heavens hate the ones who thought they were going to hail bop?
Yep. They didn't think it; they just did it.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
lol @ u! i stand out in a crowd and slay, brah

Spoiler:
Yeah, just like Canuck fans lining the streets for the Stanley Cup parade.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:28 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rei Ayanami
not in SE, but ty anyway
Well, your effort is noted and appreciated - in SE and wherever else you may roam
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:29 PM
Love RAIDS trying to offer meta-commentary on the EPL thread.

Last edited by Das Boot; 04-27-2013 at 04:33 PM. Reason: he's right about tuck's homophobia tho
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:32 PM
oski must have noticed that he was no longer in the mad thread title and decided to take action.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
Are you saying you honestly believe that Tuq (in real life) is homophobic?
I believe that if one feels confident enough to publicly express a quasi-homophobic opinion the odds are fairly good that person harbors homophobic feelings.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Das Boot
Love RAIDS trying to offer meta-commentary on the EPL thread.
In your head much?
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:37 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Horton
In your head much?
No. Just laughing at Ray Horton, Thread Doctor.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:37 PM
this is Oski's idea of adding value to the forum, see how awesome things used to be!?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oski
Yeah, just like Canuck fans lining the streets for the Stanley Cup parade.
nah ppl don't line the streets for the parade if you don't win (the Canucks never have and never will). you see, typically the parade is held a few days after a team wins a championship, so it wouldn't happen if you lose in the finals ... no one is that stupid, not even a permanently banned soccer p0ster i'd imagine.

other than that, good one!
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phildo
oski must have noticed that he was no longer in the mad thread title and decided to take action.
That escaped my notice. I think me being I'm that title was exceptionally misguided, anyway.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Das Boot
No. Just laughing at Ray Horton, Thread Doctor.
Patient: Das Boot
Diagnosis: severe NPD
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote
04-27-2013 , 04:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray Horton
I believe that if one feels confident enough to publicly express a quasi-homophobic opinion the odds are fairly good that person harbors homophobic feelings.
No. This is an injustice, and shame on you.

You throw around these harsh labels quite carelessly. Shame on you - you ****ing bastard.

So, we go from "homophobic" to now, "quasi-homophobic?" You are comfortable damning someone in earnest over what you now say is "quasi-homophobic."

Beyond that, you say based on this "quasi-homophobic" remark that you are comfortable of labeling him homophobic in real life? Get out of town, bro.

Pathetic. This isn't the same thing as catching a Shepard ****ing a sheep; this is a Shepard telling a joke about a Shepard ****ing a sheep.

I guess this will be lost on all the sheep in here, anyway.
Who are the bad SE p0sters? DRAFT Quote

      
m