Quote:
Originally Posted by brandoncla
RG3 is more quick than Cam, but throws the ball about the same as Cam imo (both are pretty damn good). Cam is a physical freak tho 6'5 240-250 that can run 4.4 playing QB good luck tackling that guy... RG3 is faster he used to run track, and Baylor is a big time track school so i'm sure he got some training in his college time. He's got a slimmer build than Cam. I would say RG3 is going to have the edge in avoiding contact and pure mobility vs. Cam. He's going to be the quicker more agile of the 2. But, that's also an unfair comparison when you take a look at the pure size of Cam Newton you start to see how much of a beast he is.
I don't think RG3 will run the ball anywhere near as much as Cam did. Yes he was a track star, but a lot of the "RG3 is a great running QB" hype comes from racist stereotypes imo. Their college rushing stats in their final year at school:
Cam: 264 attempts for 1473 yards(5.6 average), 20 TDs
RG3: 179 attempts for 699 yards(3.9 average), 10 TDs
The reason that RG3 is seen as a better prospect than Cam(remember that many people heavily criticized Cam coming into the NFL, and he wasn't thought of as a super elite prospect) is solely due to his passing ability. Here were their passing stats:
Cam: 185/280(66.1%) for 2854 yards, 30 TDs, 7 INTs
RG3: 291/402(72.4%) for 4293 yards, 37 TDs, 6 INTs
RG3 will be a great athlete who uses his athleticism to move around in the pocket in order to set up throws most of the time. He won't be a run-first QB. I think Steve Young is the best comparison.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlVectorForce1
i think RG3 is going to be a semi-bust and i'm 100% serious on this.
he didn't play against top flight SEC defenses and now it's the big leagues. he's in trouble. plus washington has no draft for the next few years
So is it your opinion that any player who doesn't play in the best defensive conference and goes to a team that traded multiple drafts picks to select him will be a bust or is there more to your argument than that?
What if some team had offered the Colts a ton of picks(lets say 4 1st rounders) for the rights to draft Andrew Luck? Would you then say that Luck would be a semi-bust due to the same reasoning? Don't you think theres more to evaluating prospects than these two pieces of criteria? Also if we are giving someone credit for playing against SEC defenses then don't we have to recognize that he has SEC level talent around him on offense?
Last edited by Assani Fisher; 06-18-2012 at 11:58 AM.