Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Sounds like the marketing woman is a co-favorite to win. Isn’t that like worst case scenario?
that is my understanding, yes
that she is the establishment choice connected to Gulati etc
(but tbf i've read basically nothing about any of this)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Incompetent, understaffed, and racist. But hey we made $100 million dollars. Wtf. Why is US Soccer worried about maximizing profit and not ****ing winning.
I knew something was really wrong when Wynalda published an open letter about his campaign for president and the focus was on transparency in vendor bids. Like wtf no one ****ing cares about that Eric. We want to win, we have talent and resources. And we are somehow going backwards!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
ya same with Kathy Carter (Soccer United Marketing president), who is supposedly one of the front-runners afaik. think she's being supported by the outgoing guy, and thought i saw that even Billy Boy Simba said that she'd be perfect for the job. oh yeah, why?
(i guess she must be connected to all the LA money ppl in his network)
US Soccer!
1. profit
2. ???
3. profit
Quote:
Originally Posted by domer2
this should dissuade any rational person from thinking SUM should get more power than it has already...
Quote:
Kyle Martino took the criticism a step further, making an assertion (unsupported by any previously known evidence) that SUM controlled the decision to stage the U.S.-Costa Rica World Cup qualifier at Red Bull Arena in Harrison, N.J., in September to prioritize profit from attracting the greatest number of Costa Rica fans. (The U.S. ended up losing the game 2-0.)
Martino wrote: “U.S. Soccer and MLS leaders one time sat on SUM board with an equity stake in the company, which could still be the case. I hope that as the campaign progresses my fellow candidate Kathy Carter will help make these relationships clear to the members and the soccer community. U.S. Soccer’s conflict of interest policy excludes SUM, which makes it possible for a SUM employee to be President of US Soccer or a US Soccer employee to be paid by SUM. Ethics authorities have told me that this arrangement is the reason conflict of interest policies exist. The contract SUM has with U.S. Soccer has never been bid out and the specifics of the deal have never been made public. All we know is the contract expires in 2022.”
Martino went on: “There are many perceived conflicts of interest but a clear way the arrangement affects the players was the decision to have a World Cup qualifier at Red Bull Arena against Costa Rica. Home World Cup qualifiers are crucial, which is why home teams go to great lengths to tip the competitive advantage in their favor. Even the length of the grass is meticulously planned. Having played Costa Rica in a WCQ at old Saprissa Stadium I can tell you this from personal experience, it was terrifying.
“SUM is the marketing partner for CONCACAF so it made a business decision, without consulting the coach of the National Team, to prioritize profit, which gave our competition an advantage by hosting a game in a location that would produce the highest turnout of their fans. Bryan Ruiz spoke in an interview after the game about how enjoyable it was to play in front of so many of their fans saying, ‘We felt very, very comfortable.’ This decision contributed to the U.S. failing to qualify for the World Cup in Russia, costing our federation tens of millions of dollars in lost revenue. It’s a decision that never would have been made without this conflict of interest.”
also read something yesterday about how all the sniping among all the other candidates will probably allow her to win, how they need to bang together and rally around 1 person (e.g. Martino) to prevent that from happening
has anyone read the various proposals from the candidates?
if so, do any of them have positive ideas for player development?