Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58)
View Poll Results: What will be the outcome of the game?
Falcons win; over
37 32.17%
Falcons win; under
15 13.04%
Pats win, don't cover; over
3 2.61%
Pats win, don't cover; under
7 6.09%
Pats cover; over
20 17.39%
Pats cover; under
33 28.70%

02-06-2017 , 01:41 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcolin
Needs moar luv.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 01:45 AM
Hate the B/B Pats as much as you can muster, but no denying all SEVEN of their SBs have delivered as supremely exciting games from a fan perspective.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 01:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ntanygd760
but which was luckier, patriots finally getting the lucky catch
yeah, about time those plucky Pats finally caught a break
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 01:54 AM
the Pats never get blown out. I remember they played the 49ers when they were good and got down 28-0 or something and barely lost.

Brady GOAT.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 01:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Synchronic
Maybe for all sports. Def for football.


Jean van de Velde
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 01:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rawlz517
The square I hit was split with a co-worker. Guy running the pool just messaged him asking how much we want him to send him post-tip.

Is it just me, or is that douchey af?
WAT?
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 01:56 AM
the kerse catch was 50 times easier. you cant be serious.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 01:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brocktoon
Jean van de Velde
Obviously correct answer.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OmgGlutten!
the Pats never get blown out. I remember they played the 49ers when they were good and got down 28-0 or something and barely lost.

Brady GOAT.
Eh, the Lawyer Milloy game, the wildcat Ronnie Brown game, the Ray Rice debacle, the Arrowhead massacre, it happens.

But anyone who bet against them on the 2nd half line tonight, lololol.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:10 AM
I really think as brutal as this loss is, it's better than losing a blowout like 35-13 and be proven to be frauds. I mean if you can lead a SB by 19 after 3 quarters, then it's an easier to sell to say you can win a SB imo
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:13 AM
Pats are sb champions Bros
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:22 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by businessdude
I really think as brutal as this loss is, it's better than losing a blowout like 35-13 and be proven to be frauds. I mean if you can lead a SB by 19 after 3 quarters, then it's an easier to sell to say you can win a SB imo
I coulda been a contendah.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by businessdude
I really think as brutal as this loss is, it's better than losing a blowout like 35-13 and be proven to be frauds. I mean if you can lead a SB by 19 after 3 quarters, then it's an easier to sell to say you can win a SB imo
lol. no it's not

the fall is always worse the higher up it's from. i doubt there's a single falcons fan who preferred this outcome over a 45-0 loss
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by businessdude
I really think as brutal as this loss is, it's better than losing a blowout like 35-13 and be proven to be frauds. I mean if you can lead a SB by 19 after 3 quarters, then it's an easier to sell to say you can win a SB imo
Of course. The 03 Red Sox had a World Series appearance in their immediate grasp and pissed it away by keeping in Pedro one inning too many in the ALCS game 7. Dum-dum. The 04 team came back from an 0-3 ALCS deficit to win the whole thing.

I would bet on Falcons barely making playoffs as WC next year, but then shipping it. At the right odds, ofc.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by legend42
Of course. The 03 Red Sox had a World Series appearance in their immediate grasp and pissed it away by keeping in Pedro one inning too many in the ALCS game 7. Dum-dum. The 04 team came back from an 0-3 ALCS deficit to win the whole thing.

I would bet on Falcons barely making playoffs as WC next year, but then shipping it. At the right odds, ofc.
i'll give you 3-1.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:31 AM
if they get blown out - it would be "they need to retool the offense - GB and Seattle weren't that good defensively, a good defense can shut them down", etc etc.

you'd be questioning the whole team instead of being able to write it off to bad play-calling with a lead
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:34 AM
broncos got utterly eviscerated and changed nothing. won it all 2 years later

cardinals lost on the final play 8 years ago. never got back

football has way too much variance for a super bowl appearance to ever be a certainty unless you're the pats. there's a non-zero chance this game gives ryan a thousand yard stare of shookness he never recovers from
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:34 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinivici9586
i'll give you 3-1.
I'll give you

Spoiler:
+350
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by legend42
Of course. The 03 Red Sox had a World Series appearance in their immediate grasp and pissed it away by keeping in Pedro one inning too many in the ALCS game 7. Dum-dum. The 04 team came back from an 0-3 ALCS deficit to win the whole thing.

I would bet on Falcons barely making playoffs as WC next year, but then shipping it. At the right odds, ofc.
Spurs in '14 also bounced back from a brutal loss to win the title the next year.

But football is a little tougher, just so tough to get back to begin with. That division could certainly be better too.

I dunno, we'll see.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:38 AM
This is what we get for deleting Riverman's SB thread
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:38 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoppedRainingMen
lol. no it's not

the fall is always worse the higher up it's from. i doubt there's a single falcons fan who preferred this outcome over a 45-0 loss
it's a worse loss for the emotions of this game, but going forward for next year, they know they can win a ring - if they lose 45-0 , they were an overrated joke.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 02:42 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by muttiah
This is what we get for deleting Riverman's SB thread

haha
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 03:11 AM
Edelman sounded concussed yet again in his NFLN interview... talked pretty slowly and took him forever to turn his head to the speaker. Not surprised, he destroys his body given his size.

But people compare Julio's crazy catch to Edelman's like they compare Julio to Edelman. Different players, different skills. Julio is way more athletic and makes the better catch but Edelman's is still sick and beats DBs like a drum.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 03:19 AM
James White set a Super Bowl record by scoring 20 points (3 touchdowns, 1 two-point conversion).

The old record must have been 18. Several players have three touchdowns.
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote
02-06-2017 , 03:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by imjosh
S-tier
SUPER BOWL LI: GOOD (+3) vs. EVIL (o/u 58) Quote

      
m