Quote:
Originally Posted by Bode-ist
Love how a list of the best places to live totally has to do with just finances and nothing to do with actual important factors like things to do, weather, and population. I do enjoy how the list is a lot of exurbs/outer suburbs, so yeah, great list for people over 40 who enjoy doing absolutely nothing except sit at home. If that's what the list is supposed to be, then it's spot on. Fishers, IN seems especially hilarious. Good job just choosing some random city close to Indianapolis, but outside of the interstate loop because otherwise it would be TOO CLOSE and throwing it in the list.
I get that it's MONEY Magazine, so they are rating it based off of financial factors over everything else, but who can actually take this list seriously? Novi over Ann Arbor? Appleton over Madison? Just two easy examples that anyone with half a brain would disagree with immediately.