Quote:
Originally Posted by BobboFitos
Can someone explain whats going on in oregon to me
Not really, and I tried to get it.
It appears that two dudes who had previously been convicted of arson for the obviously intentional burning of government land were released after short prison terms, and then sent back to jail on an appeal regarding the Constitutionality of their punishments. Legally, the appeal leading to longer sentences (4 more years each) seems pretty bull**** and against at least the spirit of their agreement with the prosecution, but the idea is that the trial court found their threatened prison terms too long and cruel and unusual, the prosecution appealed and won. Thus, these two - the Hammonds - are going back to jail.
Anyway, THOSE TWO aren't actually part of the actual armed militia takeover thing. In fact, the Hammonds denied their own involvement and were turning themselves in as it happened.
The morons in the takeover thing have used this opportunity to STRAP UP and take over some land. They have some vaguely articulated gripe about BIG GOVERNMENT taking public land from ranchers, etc., over U.S. history. I believe they want to return lots of BLM land to private citizens, with the word "return" being a semantic ploy in this sentence. It's more like "provide the federal land to private citizens because BIG GOVERNMENT took that land from other people at other times." They cast this in the veneer of a dispute about Constitutionality. It's not possible to analyze fairly because it fundamentally is actually stupid people saying stupid things, it isn't even worthy of further investigation.
They say they are committed to responding to force with force. So like, good for them. They have guns they'll shoot. This is in some ways not exactly news.
Anyway, the uproar about the RESPONSE to this is the dumbest part of all. As has become common in the liberal experience, which is what I identify as, lots of "my side" - people whom I denounce as imbeciles and who cause me to question the terms by which I identify my basic thinking about human rights and behavior - have reacted that if these dudes were brown dudes of any heritage, they'd already be dead. Thus these white dudes are NOT DEAD because of continuing racism.
This is, of course, wrong, not only because the U.S. government does have a history of shooting white militia idiots in the past, but because these clowns have "taken over" just about the most irrelevant federal land in the country. There's really no reason to risk death since there's nothing at risk anyway.
Unfortunately, there's a bloodthirst about this in which people are saying the militia guys SHOULD be killed, I suppose on the justification that (1) we can and (2) we would've if they weren't white so we HAVE TO in order to not be racists. So I mean, give that the respect it deserves, too.
Also, there's the debate about whether these guys are terrorists. Depends on definitions and isn't interesting, imo.
Cliffs: it's the stupidest thing ever