Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS

11-03-2011 , 04:19 PM
TuT sure does have a thing for being an internet forum martyr. I think the ban is good for Epi and TuT, because clearly they have too much of themselves invested in this forum.

RIP.

I miss G10.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 04:36 PM
A forum where only banned posters could post would be pretty sweet
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 04:41 PM
It'd be just like Mario Kart where if you lose the battle, you come back as a bomb.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 05:03 PM
it was clear from the beginning G10 would come back sooner or later. Way too many hints from Clark plus there doesn't appear to be a Tuq figure in his case.

GREEEEAR will be FRED
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 05:05 PM
Actually a great idea. Idiot posters would intentionally get banned and the mains would be much improved.

And then you could re-perma everyone from the banned forum as a trick.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 05:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadood228
TuT sure does have a thing for being an internet forum martyr. I think the ban is good for Epi and TuT, because clearly they have too much of themselves invested in this forum.

RIP.

I miss G10.
they just take SE way too seriously
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 05:25 PM
but they don't even care about SE brah
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 05:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NozeCandy
A forum where only banned posters could post would be pretty sweet
Yup this needs to happen.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 06:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prohornblower
He argued with me in a gameday thread for over an hour about a play that he hadn't even seen. Yet, I didn't know he hadn't seen it until the hour later when he rewound his DVR and finally saw it.

He also said I shouldn't talk about the play because as a Texans fan, I was "too biased", whereas he was only "probably biased" as a Ravens fan.

So he said we should appeal to a third party* (at this point I still assumed he had seen the play - which he had not) (Chim17 - a Broncos fan was the third party viewer) who had seen that play, but had missed another one that would have helped prove my point. Then he pointed to Chim and was like "See, see! You're wrong, Chim said so. Thanks, Chim!"

It was utterly ridiculous and filled with typical Assani condecention and "my **** don't stink" attitude that he spews about the threads.

He also has a habit of calling everybody "biased" when he's far more biased about his 2 favorite teams than most posters on this site about their single favorite team.

He's certainly not close to ban-able though.

*I informed him that a third-party had already ruled in. CBS sports showed a replay and basically made fun of the refs for missing such a blatant (and hugely important) call. 4th and 1 Arian Foster stuffed but with a blatant 15 yard facemask that should have given them first down. But nah he didn't want to accept CBS sports. I guess they are biased Texans fans or something. He arbitrarily chose Chim as the arbitrator.
Ok, so he's probably just a terrible NFL poster. I don't venture into those woods, so I can't evaluate, judge, or analyze.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 06:34 PM
There will be no peace around these parts until Maggert is allowed to come back home.

Free Maggert.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 06:49 PM
Yeah I was on the ban Maggert bandwagon at the time but given the last month's events and the current standards for bannage, he should be freed.

Last edited by Riverman; 11-03-2011 at 06:51 PM. Reason: that and jaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaashhhhhh sucking
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 06:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luke Wilkshere
There will be no peace around these parts until Maggert is allowed to come back home.

Free Maggert.
Be warned - not gonna have any difficulty pulling the trigger on this account given how new and low volume it is.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 07:00 PM
OK on a serious note, how the **** has gruna not been banned? He seems to be legitimately mentally ******ed.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 07:04 PM
lol down's syndrome... lol system of a down... lol tate forcier
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 07:06 PM
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 07:22 PM
On another serious note this post really cuts through all the nonsense imo:

Quote:
Originally Posted by anatta
man theres nowhere else to be there nobody else to be man just post ur post man art for art sake battle thems trying to make a name for themselves man did u see tebow yes its dukkha but less so than anything else in this slaving meat wheel spitting out and chewing up flesh like the terminator its what it does its all it does so man sports and beer forgive me mom but its a poor mans vacation yes creativity friends boobs brawn and booze nowhere else to be nobody else to be.
I'm not going to stir up a fuss but I don't really see any good reason mods should exist for any purpose other than banning spammers, people who post offensive text or pictures and people who post illegal things other than to make sure discussion goes exactly how a select group of posters wants it to go like someone else said. It's not the end of the world that that's the case but acting if there's some sort of objective measure of "quality of discussion" is silly. People have different tastes.

Mods should just let people post their post man. Art for art's sake.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 07:41 PM
Quote:
exactly how a select group of posters wants it to go
its worse bc this group is infinitely more vocal than the silent majority. bc they bitch and moan, their agenda gets promoted and, ultimately, good posters get banned. ironically, when others question the move after the fact, or attempt to defend those on thin ice, we get labeled whiners ourselves, along with getting placed on the troublemaker list for possible purging.

further, our aims arent taken seriously even when they may merit consideration. i think phb is an awful poster and a huge "net negative" to these forums. he posts a ton, apparently is incapable of thinking prior to posting, and has shown incapable of changing his viewpoint when facing insurmountable evidence and logic the contrary. this leads to annoying derails of bickering spanning multiple pages. sounds kinda familiar i guess.

now the proper course of action would be to report many of his posts while waging a behind the scenes lobbying campaign, as it appears many did against epi and bitchface. but that seems pretty boring, takes a long time, and likely wouldnt be successful. its also against my principles in believing that its the lol internet and if ppl cant handle morans and trolls then they should gtfo.

unfortunately, it seems that a vocal core of posters greatly desire to homogenize the forums. eliminate those that post contrary opinions in a brash and edgy style. its gonna make the place boring fast.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 07:54 PM
oh get over yourselves

you want to make martyrs out of people because they were *******s on an internet forum, go ahead, but realize how ridiculous you sound

pretty lol how you're making arguments toward a "silent majority" when a number of people itt have made it clear they were sick of those guys. "silent majority" = "a bunch of people i can invent and assume support whatever position i do"
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 07:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nath
oh get over yourselves

you want to make martyrs out of people because they were *******s on an internet forum, go ahead, but realize how ridiculous you sound
yep, that about sums it up.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 08:00 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nath
oh get over yourselves

you want to make martyrs out of people because they were *******s on an internet forum, go ahead, but realize how ridiculous you sound

pretty lol how you're making arguments toward a "silent majority" when a number of people itt have made it clear they were sick of those guys. "silent majority" = "a bunch of people i can invent and assume support whatever position i do"
you do realize most ppl supported bitchface?

epi may be a stretch, but id imagine if there was a mandatory vote ppl would support him.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 08:01 PM
Victor you obliterate your own argument.

You are constantly taking contradictory positions and being rude, yet everyone likes you.

Why? Because you aren't a ****ing ****** on purpose. That's what got them tossed, and rightfully so.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 08:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyleb
lol down's syndrome... lol system of a down... lol tate forcier
Kyle, do you even support a college team? Tate forcier? Does Cleveland St. even have a team?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 08:12 PM
cleveland state made the dance like two years ago, and kent state upset indiana with antonio gates man
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 08:13 PM
Victor quit making logical arguments. There is no place for that here.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
11-03-2011 , 08:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Victor
epi may be a stretch, but id imagine if there was a mandatory vote ppl would support him.
lol no way, and i say that as somebody who wanted to keep epi around, if only for his weekly frosting reviews
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote

      
m