Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS

05-09-2011 , 11:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by sethypooh21
This is all spectacularly unhelpful in the context of this discussion and is exactly the kind of **** we're trying to cut down on from anyone.
so it seems like going foward, if someone says something assclown ******ed we should either agree or say nothing

but if me or bitchface say anything thats less ******ed it deserves 5 pages in the faq thread, actual temp bans and possibilities of permabans

Last edited by EPiPeN11; 05-09-2011 at 11:36 PM.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobboFitos
I thought there already was an advanced stats FAQ that tarheels and I did some time ago?
could be, i must have missed it. if you can find it then PM it to me or another mod, and maybe that'll be a start.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:28 PM
am I too late to vote for K-Love for MVP?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetto
am I too late to vote for K-Love for MVP?
hahaha
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyenimator
i just read the babip post and it's kind of bad imo. hitters have a fair amount of control over their babip. i just made a post about this in the giants thread and then reposted it in the mlb thread but see ichiro suzuki vs mark mcgwire.
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPiPeN11
so it seems like going foward, if someone says something assclown ******ed we should either agree or say nothing
maybe you could try refuting it using logic and **** instead of just posting "lol ur so dumb" or its equivalent
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:39 PM
jesus christ i dropped out of college to get away from this stat ****
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:41 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phildo
maybe you could try refuting it using logic and **** instead of just posting "lol ur so dumb" or its equivalent
whats the point of trying if there is a legit 0% chance of said person changing their mind? i'd rather waste my time on arguments that are close and that i have a legit chance of changing someones mind (or my own mind since the argument is actually close and not a ******ed joke argument)

also lol @ singling me out when tons of other ppl do the same thing, not even just tz regs but se regs. if someone posts that ben roethlisberger is the best qb in the nfl, how are nfl regs gonna react? are they gonna break it down and explain why they are wrong? lol no

edit: also i don't really read nfl threads but a little birdy on skype jus said u are the king of no content lols in nfl threads so that's even moar hilarious coming from u

Last edited by EPiPeN11; 05-09-2011 at 11:50 PM.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:44 PM
aggressively stating that joe thornton > pavel datsyuk without any substantive defense should be a bannable offense.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:47 PM
yes good point epipen. the nfl discussion in se is also generally terrible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Booker Woodfox
jesus christ i dropped out of college to get away from this stat ****
one thing i will never understand is people that spend hundreds/thousands of hours discussing sports but don't seem to want to learn how they actually work.

the casual fans who just want to pop a beer, relax in front of a tv and not think about it i get. but people who apparently love sports enough to spend an absurd amount of time talking about them on the internet but not enough to spend a fraction of that time learning don't make any sense to me.

different strokes tho
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-09-2011 , 11:55 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by <3_Tha_Grind
aggressively stating that joe thornton > pavel datsyuk without any substantive defense should be a bannable offense.
idk, i think that CHOKEZ/WANGZ thread is the SE equivalent of the "hitting zone" behind the net in the NHL. anything goes, bro!

Spoiler:
but yeah, would be nice if AJ would try to $how his work there instead of just trolling **** up
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 12:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phildo
different strokes tho
Exactly damn right. There is nothing wrong with enjoying sports as mindless entertainment. Or as some form of crude morality play. Or in whatever way that floats your personal boat.

The problem with "learning how [sports] actually work" is that even the deepest analysis is only predictive, it's not determinative. Luck is a material factor in pretty much every game and no matter how much study you put in, you will never "solve" a sport in a meaningful manner (unless possibly beating Vegas is meaningful to you).
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 12:18 AM
I agree. But Phildo's point is this: Who comes on to a forum to say JETAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH all damn day and talk about how sweet his defense is?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 12:23 AM
Jetto?

Just kidding obv

Last edited by Booker Woodfox; 05-10-2011 at 12:36 AM. Reason: Is this a trick question? I don't ever read the Yankees thread as I assume that it's 100% full of AIDSSSSS
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 12:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by <3_Tha_Grind
aggressively stating that joe thornton > pavel datsyuk without any substantive defense should be a bannable offense.
In the past two days 72off has stated that Jeremy Roenick was never a top-10 player at his position in his prime and cited +/- defending players' defensive prowess. If he's allowed to do that, AJ should be okay.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 12:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kyleb
I am not in the majority when it comes to these things, but if someone said "such and such metric means this, go figure it out," I would gladly do that in order to contribute to the discussion at hand rather than say something like "why don't YOU explain it you big dick cheese." Chances are good a simple Google search will uncover what you need to know, and if you can't find it then, you should then ask questions.

But again I understand such thinking is generally not accepted as reasonable for sports discussions on this site.
Part of the reason I lurk the MLB thread but read the vast majority of it is because I just don't understand the stats. And as I've said previously, I have no desire to learn the stats. I am one thats perfectly content with avg/era/obp with the knowledge that they are very inferior stats.

Two reasons I have no desire to learn is that among my friends baseball is the most discussed sport(they understand that football is my job and discussion is minimal understanding that). These guys are casualsportsfan.jpg and avg/rbis/hrs/wins/era are their best arguments and I just don't want to get into how its flawed because its just friendly convos.

The second part is that baseball is my "get away" sport. I dont watch basketball or hockey(though I'll have the games on my TV its more noise than anything). I just want it to be casual for myself rather than get caught up with it. And that casualfan.jpg doesn't go well with the MLB regular season thread(rightfully so as the stuff gets lol'd at in the NFL threads, I get it).
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 12:33 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Franchise 60
This thread was way better when it consisted of me making fun of Karak and his always dry fingers.
*Insert Needle nostalgia quote here.*
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 12:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cwicemvp12
In the past two days 72off has stated that Jeremy Roenick was never a top-10 player at his position in his prime and cited +/- defending players' defensive prowess. If he's allowed to do that, AJ should be okay.
cwice gonna Karak/goofy.

Last edited by 72off; 05-10-2011 at 01:33 AM.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 01:13 AM
I think 72off was the mod who got pissed when I said who are WSHs defenders
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 01:16 AM
He had(/has I guess) legitimate reason to be pissed at me, he never actually "said" that JR was never a top-10 player during his prime but I took his post as heavily implying it as such.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 01:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jetto
I think 72off was the mod who got pissed when I said who are WSHs defenders
no, you asked if they were any good, when the previous X number of pages were specifically talking about how bad they were. it seemed like an obvious troll given that the #1 seed just went down 0-3 in a playoff series. but yeah, keep playing dumb or whatever this gimmick is supposed to be.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 01:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack of Arcades
Do you now believe that Dirk is a top 5 offensive player in the game, and top 3 overall?
yes.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 09:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPiPeN11
whats the point of trying if there is a legit 0% chance of said person changing their mind? i'd rather waste my time on arguments that are close and that i have a legit chance of changing someones mind (or my own mind since the argument is actually close and not a ******ed joke argument)

also lol @ singling me out when tons of other ppl do the same thing, not even just tz regs but se regs. if someone posts that ben roethlisberger is the best qb in the nfl, how are nfl regs gonna react? are they gonna break it down and explain why they are wrong? lol no

edit: also i don't really read nfl threads but a little birdy on skype jus said u are the king of no content lols in nfl threads so that's even moar hilarious coming from u

It is easy to single you out because it is all you do. All day erryday you trollin'

Is there some kind of unknown rule I have missed that has allowed Epi to just continually troll and such? Why is Vic banned over him? Sincere question, btw, I thought Vic was pretty useful at times at least and Epi has been at a pretty close to 100% trolling rate for some time
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 10:00 AM
Is there some kind of unknown rule I have missed that has allowed schwallie to just continually slobber all over lebron, never add any content and snap at anyone who even slightly bashes his boy? Why is Vic banned over him? Sincere question, btw, I thought Vic was pretty useful at times at least and schwallie has been at a pretty close to 100% only talking/slobbering over lebron and the heat rate for some time.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 10:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPiPeN11
Is there some kind of unknown rule I have missed that has allowed schwallie to just continually slobber all over lebron and never add any content and snap at anyone who even slightly bashes his boy? Why is Vic banned over him? Sincere question, btw, I thought Vic was pretty useful at times at least and schwallie has been at a pretty close to 100% only talking/slobbering over lebron and the heat.
I would expect nothing less, classic Epi haha. I like it though, but I've actually talked quite a bit within the other threads about other teams etc recently. Slowly getting better at NBA
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
05-10-2011 , 10:07 AM
x-posting this from the epl thread since i'm not sure englishmen can actually read

any good soccer books? ranging from a strong interesting history, to soccernomics type stuff (thats basically the only soccer book i've read)
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote

      
m