Anyone who says C-Vig is a bad poster needs to publicly reinforce their position so I can mock them. tut 50/50 victor=GOAT level depending on the person.

Tuq didn't even know Jetto was involved in any way. Jetto showed up posting some painfully obvious remark and got banned for being in the way. And who was victor/tut/c-vig trolling? No one cares/likes Rat. It was a couple of forgettable posts that would have been quickly glossed over but someone had a chance to turn himself into the center of attention and took it. The mods didn't built this forum either nobody gives a **** about the mods.

Trolling would be acknowledging you any further. I really don't care what you say since this isn't (suppose to be) about your rather your inane actions.

You are making it a tad too obvious dye.

Thanks, will tone it down.

I've been off the roids lately so my posting hasn't been up to par. Any tips?

the irony is even if i was the forums biggest unbanned problem child i'd still be far far far less detrimental to this forum than u have been as a mod

2 times in over a year? that's less than once every 6 months. good job budday


who the hell levels on 90% of there posts? rat levels on 100% and no skyper is prob above like 25% aside from him. u guys are jus horrible at picking up levels so u throw around hilariously inaccurate percentages. for example, dye has been leveling for like the past 5 posts hes made and no one called him out on it except for franchise, u guys actually thought he was being serious

$how ur work

The 72off multi-quotezilla's have really grown on me.

From a moderator's perspective I have always tried to do right by the average user, the person who just wants to discuss sports with a little inevitable trolling that comes with the territory.

A huge mistake was made by thinking that high volume regs such as yourself were above discipline and that you would lead by example. Instead you have been given more than enough rope to hang yourself, and in the process tarded this forum up beyond belief. You rarely try anymore, and when you do it's more than offset by the trouble you cause. And, ironically, the rope you have been given has emboldened you to call names to the people who have enabled you to become full blown AIDS to the forum.

I'll consult with the others but as far as I'm concerned you're not welcome here anymore. They're welcome to object but this discussion has happened far too many times.

Less than half a time every three months.

ruh roh

Typical talk of a guy on his last legs. Trying to lessen your sentence by throwing others under the bus.

lol i've def calmed down the occasionally leveling which i did when i got warned. I don't think i've made even 1 level post in the past week when i got unbanned for trolling nor have i called anyone any names. get off ur power trip.

Epippen is cool in my book. Kids got heart.

You all suck.

caldarooni

I've got a dumb idea.

SE BAN nomination thread. Posting is the thread is limited to those with X number of posts in SE over the past year/whatever time frame.

Anytime someone on this forum reads a post that they believe to be trolling/inappropriate, they would come to the nomination thread and quote the post. The original original poster would then be given the opportunity to defend their post. If they get five (or however many) seconds from other regular posters, the OOP would be given one point. After a poster collects three (or five, or whatever) points from the nomination thread, another thread would be started with a simple yes/no 'should soandso be perma'd from SE'. Simple majority rules, with the caviat of having to be somewhat of an SE regular in order to vote.

Who is on board for this ridiculously convoluted, impractical plan? It would in theory put and end to biased mod decisions. There would still be bias using this plan, but it would be decreased, or smoothed out, or whatever.

Mods would still exist to delete spam, NSFW stuff, and enforce other 2+2-wide rules. SE would have no forum specific rules other than the thunder dome.

Can we also ban for posting like a 12-year-old girl texting?

I nominate suzzer

That would explain the Ke$ha love.

Just get rid of everyone who lives in a city that has not won a title within the last 2 years. This is Sporting Events, not Trying To Play Sporting Events.

NOTC's suggestion seems like a bastard child of post reporting and "Liking"

I know I said I'd shut up, but this is a more general thing so I'm allowing myself...

The problem with this is that ignoring any of the specifics of SE, the posts that obviously break the rules are easy for mods to deal with assuming they see them. It's the folks that are smart enough to stay within the lines mostly, but constantly do little things that are problematic. You have to look at people's overall body's of work, and even then it can become a judgement call for a mod. You end up basically having to judge people's intent, and that's tricky.

I live in New Orleans, it would be hard to hop on the WANGZ wagon if I was actually still living in Michigan. Anyway hockey isn't even a sport, should probably be a subforum of golf or something.