Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS

04-26-2011 , 02:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speel Posher
Some of the bans were deserved because the trolling was getting excessive. However, imo, it was the stupid irrational hatred of TZ and it's posters that started this whole drama filled sorority bitch fest. I think a couple of you guys need to be prescribed a gallon of Assani Fishers' sans alcohol, or at least a decent douche for the sand(in your vaginas).

This isn't an uber elite forum where people can only discuss sports at the highest level. It's a public forum where people can post casually or more seriously. If you don't like somebody's posting style then put them on ignore, and if you are still irritated by the occasional quoted post of said ignored poster, then sack the **** up and get over it.


the state of the forum messages, excessive trolling, and SZ conspiracies all just need to stop, and let's go NBA, MLB, NHL, or whatever sport tickles your fancy.
This this and this.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:23 PM
Quote:
This isn't an uber elite forum where people can only discuss sports at the highest level. It's a public forum where people can post casually or more seriously. If you don't like somebody's posting style then put them on ignore, and if you are still irritated by the occasional quoted post of said ignored poster, then sack the **** up and get over it.
When all of the forum's mods take issue with the posters style- you may want to rethink "this is what the forum is like" arguments. Whatever norms you think exist clearly aren't what the people steering the forum want. That's been made clear, adapt or find a new place with norms you can tolerate.

As a basic outsider, the people I understand to be TZ regs spend the bulk of the time making terrible, bratty, no content posts, and not just in SE. The worst part is that they're more than willing to fire off a couple lines of snobbish contrary u madism, but never willing to actually engage in a conversation. It's not that everybody needs to be super serious, but it would be nice if people were trying to have a conversation and not just score sick burn points and impress their friends with their capacity to be aloof.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:24 PM
we sure are blessed to have Dids' input on a forum he never participates on
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:25 PM
how much do mods get paid?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
we sure are blessed to have Dids' input on a forum he never participates on
terrible, bratty posts itt
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
we sure are blessed to have Dids' input on a forum he never participates on
Oh rly?

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/se...rchid=18072544
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
Sorry - no matches. Please try some different terms.

Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:34 PM
Meh, I generally agree with Tuq, but I don't think Victor or FlyingRat should be perma banned over this. It was a lame prank, but nothing too serious. A one week ban or something similar for Victor I can understand, since circumventing the ban was dumb.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:38 PM
Though I will say at times I'm not even sure Victor enjoys posting here anymore. Dude has started to seem kind of miserable as of late.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:39 PM
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:49 PM
Triumph is right.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyenimator
Triumph is right.
Hell hath no fury like a skyper scorned.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 02:57 PM
I'm actually preparing and practicing my wolf game.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuq
Many would argue that the bad modding has been going on for months or longer, as lame trolling/leveling went unchecked and that apparently was interpreted as a green light to do obnoxious things like troll drafts ("but we're just having fun! gosh guys, y so serious?"), and now this really stupid hoax.
I don't know about others, but I concur with this. With each troll or level that's been let through, it's an insult upon the mods. Basically denigrating and degrading your "duty" on here. It really is a slippery slope, and the broken windows/glass theory may be the best way to deal with the issue.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:10 PM
Oh no someone insulted the mods BOO HOO. This forum is for posting, not for banning good posters.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilltown
Oh no someone insulted the mods BOO HOO. This forum is for posting, not for banning good posters.
Town, posting is not equal to leveling or trolling. You of all people should know this. In fact, I don't believe you're qualified to speak on such an issue, because of your dealings with tuq in the past.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:17 PM
Damn, serious business going on.

Can we unban Victor if he wins in a deathmatch with a wolf?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dids
When all of the forum's mods take issue with the posters style- you may want to rethink "this is what the forum is like" arguments. Whatever norms you think exist clearly aren't what the people steering the forum want. That's been made clear, adapt or find a new place with norms you can tolerate.
I agree. The mods do have a responsibility to keep things within forum rules. I wasn't directing my post at them. That part was meant for the posters that want to ban somebody for not being a good poster(in their eyes) instead of breaking forum rules. If we go that route, I am confident all of us could come up with at least 1-2 posters we do not like that we should have removed for being annoying.




Quote:
As a basic outsider, the people I understand to be TZ regs spend the bulk of the time making terrible, bratty, no content posts, and not just in SE. The worst part is that they're more than willing to fire off a couple lines of snobbish contrary u madism, but never willing to actually engage in a conversation. It's not that everybody needs to be super serious, but it would be nice if people were trying to have a conversation and not just score sick burn points and impress their friends with their capacity to be aloof.
eh, then punish those posters as it comes, don't punish everybody else involved(in this case, jetto, rat) just because of association. also, jetto's association is just assumed, but afaik he is not in skype

edit: lol'd at bolded
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:25 PM
Dids, what were those search results you posted in response to an mjw post? The link came up empty to me.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:29 PM
It was a search for my posts in this forum. Of which there are several.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:38 PM
A handful of posts in a few threads, none of which are frequented by the people in question. Congrats! You are about as qualified to comment on this situation as you are to be a mod.

Don't worry, if we need someone to point out Michael Scott is an *******, I'll be sure to PM you.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:39 PM
dids,

while i appreciate your input, i don't think you're helping. it was 10 million percent inevitable that someone would start this debate about you posting here.

all,

while i don't think being annoying is a reason to be banned, being intentionally annoying after being warned to stop several times seems to be.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:40 PM
A search reveals that Dids has at least 250 posts in SE since 1-02-11. I would have bet the under there, I have to admit.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 03:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjw0586
A handful of posts in a few threads, none of which are frequented by the people in question. Congrats! You are about as qualified to comment on this situation as you are to be a mod.

Don't worry, if we need someone to point out Michael Scott is an *******, I'll be sure to PM you.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
04-26-2011 , 04:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dyenimator
Town, posting is not equal to leveling or trolling. You of all people should know this. In fact, I don't believe you're qualified to speak on such an issue, because of your dealings with tuq in the past.
That's not why he's not qualified, he's not qualified because he has no idea what he's talking about in this case and also is one of those who regularly complains just to hear himself. His posts are white noise.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote

      
m