Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Why? I find that posters tend as a group to be really reasonable as to who is a terrible mod. Posters also WANT the forums they post in to be well run. There are big incentives for reasonable voting.
The trouble is that there are forums which are ostensibly well-moderated but the posters are morons (NVG), then there are forums where the posters are super-argumentative and who in god's name would want to moderate that nonsense (Sports Betting), and there are forums which are generally well-behaved and why would there need to be mod replacement? (Here)
I'd agree that all moderators should be voted for but that in each year, only one moderator can be banished/replaced. Trouble is, there are some forums where the task of moderating them is so thankless that I can't see who would do it.