Quote:
Originally Posted by sethypooh21
That's fair. I have no problem dinging Da Vinci, but someone like Euclid or Newton who basically invented, discovered or formalized a basic building block, that's not nebulous to my mind.
I didn't argue with that. Newton was my #1 br0.
Quote:
Originally Posted by schu_22
Not to speak for RT, but by "early guys" I generally think along the lines of Socrates, Aristotle, Ptolemy, etc etc.
I mean, if we're going to judge solely based on how much was built off their work, then Aristotle or Socrates or someone is like the greatest human being of all time. Which is clearly not true. We have to evaluate the sheer brilliance of the work too, which is why Einstein should get a ton of credit. It's one thing to describe the world around you (not trying to knock Newton!), but to introduce a radical, totally abstract idea that turns everything we know about the universe on its head, and then have its predictions being shown to be true - that's mind-blowing in its own right.
Right, I don't give a ton of credit to what came from your work. It's obv important but I'd prefer to judge their discoveries/inventions/theories on their own.
That's obv going to be hard since you're basically asking "Which is more important Newton's theory of gravity in 1680 or Einstein's Theory of General Relativity in 1930".