Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS

03-10-2011 , 12:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClarkNasty
Epi is a smart guy and like TuT frequently takes contrarian stances that turn out to be correct, or at the very least are thought-provoking and discussion worthy. Unfortunately, he seems to basically be bored (by his own admission) and isn't trying. Epi not trying is pure troll and totally negative, which is too bad.
the bored comment which was made in the "i know everything there is to about analyzing so i get bored" or whatever the exact quote was was a clear joke.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 12:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPiPeN11
trying to argue over a players defense in the nba in an nba dynasty draft thread is a waste of time, there are no acceptable methods to measure defense that would convince u otherwise
That ignores the accusation of trolling that you immediately threw out which was of zero value, and also that is exactly why I asked you how you were so sure of the defensive values of these players, since you're constantly saying that there isn't any acceptable method to measure it. So either you're basing it off something else which I would be interested to know or you're just completely making things up to get a reaction. Either way, it doesn't change from the fact that these posts are a net negative to any actual discussion taking place, and that this is completely standard for you.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPiPeN11
the bored comment which was made in the "i know everything there is to about analyzing so i get bored" or whatever the exact quote was was a clear joke.
Doesn't make it not true (that you're bored).
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 12:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEbenhoe
That ignores the accusation of trolling that you immediately threw out which was of zero value, and also that is exactly why I asked you how you were so sure of the defensive values of these players, since you're constantly saying that there isn't any acceptable method to measure it. So either you're basing it off something else which I would be interested to know or you're just completely making things up to get a reaction. Either way, it doesn't change from the fact that these posts are a net negative to any actual discussion taking place, and that this is completely standard for you.
Big Al is terrible on d, i can tell that cause I've watched a bunch of his games and he fails the eyetest hard. Bobbo also says he fails his secret stat test hard as well.

As for sampson, obv it's hard to judge people's defense from 30 years ago so i had to google.com and take the word of others. I know he had a really good defensive rep in college as well.

"4-Sampson was a better shot blocker (again, comparing a young healthy Sampson to an old hurt Sabonis), but probably a weaker interior defender. Sampson was extremely long and a great help defender from the other side, but physically, he wasn't big or strong enough to play the stonger centers straight up. Sabonis was."

http://forums.realgm.com/boards/view...877567&start=0

not gonna paste a bunch of other links but the one above can't be accused of being a massive homer since it points out his faults. hes prob a better version of josh smith on D, sampson would obv be playing PF for me not C.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 12:44 PM
So pretty much all I'm saying, is just post that right away.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 12:44 PM
and then we get dragged into a long argument about it where u either defend big al or rip on sampson (prob both), always happens but whatever i'm done
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 12:50 PM
Because of his declining mobility I'm not sure Sampson could guard a can of stewed tomatoes much less an NBA player towards the end there.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 12:50 PM
So are you saying that you'd rather just troll and drag the level of discussion down on the forum than post a real response because you don't want to take the chance that someone might argue against what you say? I just want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly, so if I'm wrong please correct me.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kkcountry
[nit]search only brings up 250 posts per query, so vic could be way past 250 in the past week[/nit]

the problem isn't any of victor's 30+ posts a day it's the 300+ posts a day made by kids trying to be vic
If I'm posting like Victor or others think this, I'll try my best to improve.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 01:34 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEbenhoe
So are you saying that you'd rather just troll and drag the level of discussion down on the forum than post a real response because you don't want to take the chance that someone might argue against what you say? I just want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly, so if I'm wrong please correct me.
it's taking part in a long pointless argument where i have .01% chance of changing ur or anyone elses mind. everyone defends their players to the death in these drafts (i'm obv guilty of this as well) and after a while u get wiser and realize no one is gonna change their mind regardless of what u say.

this is especially true on the subject on defense where getting "proof" is pretty much impossible.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 01:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuq
Because of his declining mobility I'm not sure Sampson could guard a can of stewed tomatoes much less an NBA player towards the end there.
was talkin about his first 3-4 years fwiw
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EPiPeN11
it's taking part in a long pointless argument where i have .01% chance of changing ur or anyone elses mind. everyone defends their players to the death in these drafts (i'm obv guilty of this as well) and after a while u get wiser and realize no one is gonna change their mind regardless of what u say.

this is especially true on the subject on defense where getting "proof" is pretty much impossible.
In these cases just ignoring the conversation and moving on is much better than making troll posts.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 02:10 PM
The discussion on this Zdeno Chara hit is about to get pretty ****ing stupid again. Sigh.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 02:14 PM
What sport does he play?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 02:21 PM
Sounds like a female tennis player from Russia
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 02:21 PM
lol, and you expect votes in the NHL poster playoffs nut? Bah...BAH I say!
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 03:01 PM
i 100% have vivid memories of heckling zdeno chara in 1999 during the nba lockout at a beast of new haven hockey game
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 03:47 PM
For those of you keeping mod scores at home, 72o is doing an excellent job right now and I'd like to give my of approval.

/asskissing
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 03:53 PM
epippen

isnt pretty much all of TZ/SE people refusing to budge from their pre-conceived notions?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 04:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffRas22
epippen

isnt pretty much all of TZ/SE people refusing to budge from their pre-conceived notions?
yes, now u are slowly figuring out why i do what i do
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 04:14 PM
i dont think thats a good enough excuse

i mite be naive but i think theres enough good discussion/reasonable people on here that u should just be able to get past the times when u kno ppl are just gonna be stubborn
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 04:14 PM
If that is the way you feel, what value do you get out of continuing to post here?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffRas22
i dont think thats a good enough excuse

i mite be naive but i think theres enough good discussion/reasonable people on here that u should just be able to get past the times when u kno ppl are just gonna be stubborn
i have plenty of serious discussions on here, ppl actin like all i do is troll 100% of the time is beyond lol.
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 04:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEbenhoe
If that is the way you feel, what value do you get out of continuing to post here?
cause i get entertainment value out of posting on here?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote
03-10-2011 , 04:21 PM
So trolling people and derailing discussion is entertaining to you? And that is the reason you continue to post here?
Sporting Events FAQ, Liveblog, and BANGERS Quote

      
m