At least a werek unless it ends up being such a blowout it doesn't matter

People with a certain number of posts in SE (can mods check how many posts people have in their forum?) Should be at least a few hundred

Absolutely not EDIT: maybe if they immediately claim misclick

No preference here.


Also, I'd be down for something that punishes any reg that abstains.

see girl, only thing im trying to establish with you is not
who's right or who's wrong, but what's right and what's wrong,

5 days?
People with 100 SE posts in 2010. Votes done in thread.
Yes, they can change their vote.
Permanent.

My votes.

I think we need to have a rule on number of vote changes possible.

This is dumb. You're both good posters.

I think they should meet at Rucker Park and settle this mano y mano

On the vote changing topic:

For me personally doing vote counting, no changes makes it easiest, and it also makes people think before they vote and possibly hold off until later on in the time period to vote, all good things. However, it prevents an epic RJ vs Diebitter type meltdown. Tough decision, pros and cons of both ways.

Vote changing seems like an awful idea and much more of a hassle for meb and the other vote counters. It will lead to tons of issues later as well.

I will sell my vote for cash

I wonder who Bill Simmons will vote for.

Other than vote counting this is fine by me. We have like a combined 50,000 posts. People know who we are. If they don't know who they'd prefer by now than that's too bad. I'm not even going to be posting in the thread so there won't be any meltdowns.

I understand you might need to post funny gifs and try to win over some voters but I'm not into that politicking stuff.

I also really hope it hurts that I beat you in what is probably the worst month to do this. You get slaughtered in NBA season and I've been a huge ******* lately and I'll stlil probably win.

Just wanted to point that out in case I didn't get a chance to let you know how bad of a poster you are.

vote changing is for women. grow some stones and choose a side if you are going to vote imo

TuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuT

So we're at open for 5 days, 100 SE posts in 2010 minimum to vote, and permanent exile, and would just need an agreement on the vote changing subject. I'm on my way out, if you guys finish out the details, I'll post the thread when I get back or one of the other SE mods can feel free to start it before I get back if they choose.

No vote changing is fine

Ok, I'll post it quick before I leave then.

lol @ tut's last like 5 posts ITT. this guy just couldn't care less about this whole survivor thing, other than his 20 posts on the subject. too cool for school. oh, and he's got a built-in excuse in case he somehow loses, which he probably won't. nor will he even bother to make the survivor thread entertaining.

really my only gripe tbh.

Nah, this is no good. I like having you both around.

Of course, I didn't know that TUt was someone else before. So, I suck.
Who were you before? Or is that super-secret info?

I'm not doing it for any other reason than to stop Franchise from posting since I find his posting lately to be terrible. I wish it were you in his place, but at least he had the balls to argue with me upfront instead of passively aggressively taking shots at a few people like the little artsy fgt you are.

But hey, if he wins I really won't care. I've been spending way too much time on here anyway and could use the break.

If I win then he stops posting and everybody wins.

fyp

lulz. i'll admit to being passive-aggressive, but only because the TZ butthurt crew would've piled on, as they of course did later when someone called out your posting. and i wouldn't survivor you because those guys will all back you.

well, the **** really hit the fan here since i left work. yikes

ah damn we need modwars now