This.


Nobody is saying that Florida/UGA/LSU aren't good. What I am saying is that the middle of the SEC is just as mediocre as any conference but the middle of the SEC is VASTLY overrated because 'ITS THE SEC EVERY TEAM IS GOOD.'

Most = greater than half.

You said, "Alabama is on the same level as most conf's best teams."

Acc = yes
Pac 10 = no
Big East = no
Big 12 = no
Big 10 = no

Sorry that we're idiots who don't interpret 1 out of 5 to mean 'most'

You have some good points
You have a lot of really horrible lol-worthy points

Yeah, everything I say about the SEC is right, and everything I say about the Pac-10 reeks of homerism. (or imo is the unbiased opinion of someone who actually WATCHES Pac-10 games)

Why the hell aren't you people smart enough to point out that Vanderbilt is atop the SEC as we speak, and they'd get drilled by the #1 teams in most other conferences?

this is one of your lol-worthy points

lol

qft

FROM NOW ON EVERYONE WHO TALKS **** ABOUT ANY CONFERENCE HAS TO POST A PICTURE OF A HOTTER CONFERENCE THAT THEY'VE HAD SEX WITH

yeah you're pretty unbiased, take a look at your avatar.

hahahahaha

This.

lol @ GoldenBears claiming to be unbiased.

But he actually WATCHES the Pac-10!

the AL east sucks

wait goddamnit i forgot what my avatar was

Cubs - Rays WS?

lol @ Cubs in WS.

NL Central succcckkkkkksss bra

awesome.

This is infinitely better than Mandel's "whoever donates the most money is the best conference" ploy.

I would maintain that the Pac-10 has among the best (Arizona, Arizona State, arguably USC depending on your taste) and the worst (Stanford, Berkeley).

SEC is pretty competitive top to bottom, Big-12 could put up a fight with Texas coming in at #1 in the country overall in my unbiased opinion, because I watch Texas games.

IMO Pac 10's fourth hottest school (Oregon? Wazzu? UCLA?) is hotter than at least one other conference's top school, ergo is on par with the top school in most conferences.

Just like in football, Stanford, Northwestern and Duke are all terrible.

wat

SEC formula- play very few games of consequence OOC, and when you do make sure you play them at home and are late in the year after ratings inertia has set in, that way if one of them disappoints another one takes their place because they beat xyz SEC team, and if they keep getting rewarded for it, why should they bother to change?

Pac 10 is 10-7 against the sec since 1998

Any chance you are a Cal and WVU fan?

Any chance you acknowledge logical arguments?

Also, if that was me, I would've made them under my own screen name so I could actually back up my wild accusations with the facts that support them.