How could anybody tell the difference between a paid plant and a Trump supporter

The giant, waving Mexican flag.

(I like to think Roger Stone leaves those lying around and they just can't help themselves. The optics are glorious.)

are you proud of your trump support shane

No. He was down to like 5:1 by the time I became a believer. I have no idea how much great I have to make to absolve my sins, but I plan on finding out.

So, what is the fashion now? Are you people still behind the loony old Marxist or have y'all accepted the fate of a shrill old crook with the neocon agenda?

I literally cannot tell.

Rofl that was a good one

the world must be a big confusing conundrum for you

as it is for everyone casually throwing out ya'lls.

You have to be divorced from reality to her issues a neocon agenda.

Let's just go to the official issues page of each candidate.

First up, Clinton.

That's not a neocon agenda. Parsing that as anything close to a neocon agenda is very stupid. It is not something a smart person would do.

Now, up to the entire policy page off of the official Donald Trump website:

Now, that is a straight copy/paste of both of their full and complete intended, listed positions. How you could ever choose 2 over 1 is crazy. You have a major candidate running for president with only seven listed public positions on policy! That's insane!

if shane wants to abandon reason for madness, he has the legal right to do so, and I have a legal right to call him a ****ing moron.

Neocon usually refers to foreign policy...Hillary definitely a neocon on fp issues. Your copy paste says just that on Natl Security.

Project harder (just kidding, the salt is delicious) but I literally have no idea who ITT is on Bernie or who is on Hillary.

The energy is so low that it cannot be detected.

You support Trump. There are literally no other facts that need to be known here

lol

Same with you They-3-r

this is the exact wanting I am talking about. There is a huge, huge difference between say, Clinton and Rumsfeld or Wolfowitz. Not admitting such is just showing large bias against Clinton.

I'm sure Shane and other people who want to see the world burn will notice Trump has zero policies that help people who are worse off today. That is a feature, not a bug.

The neocon agenda refers almost exclusively to foreign policy: interventionism, nation-building, and perpetual war.

Don't worry; you wouldn't be able to copy/paste defend that either.

This is depressing.

I needed to quote this one for future use in case you also need a definition of cognitive dissonance.

That's the point, Shane. There is nothing on her page that shows her issues to support that of a neocon. You can go read them, or scroll up. If you want to say she has been near to a neocon in the past, you'd be close to right. But again, there is a vast difference between her and a true neocon. You can call her neocon adjacent, but you're supporting Donald Trump! Someone who is vastly, vastly more likely to instigate conflict! You can't be scared of bringing a knife to a gun fight then drive there in a tank.

Or, you can continue to want to vote for the guy who wants to start a trade war with China and kill the families of terrorists because they are so against conflict. I can't think of anyone alive who would instigate more conflict than Donald Trump.

It appears that someone has lost the ability to even.

Schu, can you even or cannot you even even? It seems as though you can't even.

I'd like to say I enjoy watching a man come apart, but, in this case, I cannot. Instead, I will say that I enjoy watching a person come apart.

Nice try, come harder next time

+1


lemme quote lolhoya's OP again .. so we can lolhoya some more - my bold

yes lets have a group hug, no brown people allowed

The poorly educated get 2 hugs. We love the poorly educated.

lol

lol