RE: Twitter issue...This seems to be the main ref.point
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sectio...ns_Decency_Act
Quote:
"No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider"
So if I'm getting this right the gripe is when a Twitter Admin tags a Trump tweet with "Get the facts about mail-in ballots" the implication is that the provider is advising all of the followers of said tweet that it's basically bullshit by editing the tweet with that footnote.
Taking away the who we're talking about here that's been clearly butthurt by this ordeal...the issue isn't free speech cause again he could gaf about people.
The issue is do you really want Twitter to set a precedent of any public official, could be Biden, Bernie, AOC, whoever and have Twitter edit one of their tweets.
Also what's the 2+2 equivalent? If Drumph created an account said some stupid **** (non-racist but some obvious lie like the 3 mill illegal voters that voted in 2016 that we all know is bullshit) and then got permabanned does he have the right to sue 2+2 as well...and further more would 2+2 be in the right to ban a public official, even if they violated their T&C?