Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
Pointing out how when power looks out for its own interest, it usually puts its thumb on the scale, consciously or subconsciously...
That's not a conspiracy theory and y'all really need to do better. Honestly you're being lazy and reductionist
It's not "these people got together and plotted this sinister ****" its "these people look out for their own interests individually, and this is the result"
Ok, but words have meaning tho.
I posted some **** up thread about Biden's campaign using some extra votes sent to Liz/Amy at one caucus to make sure Bernie only got 1 delegate at a site he won by 20%. They didn't break any rules, they just worked within the (admittedly dumb) rules to ensure their opponent suffered a setback. That's politics.
When people talk about the DNC "rat****ing" Bernie, they aren't talking about them running some nasty ads or something, and if you truly think that then you're being willfully naive. They're talking about an entire gamut of goofy conspiracy **** from rigged coin tosses to vote switching for which they have zero proof.
It's the difference between Belichick knowing the rules and using back-to-back penalties to run some extra time off the clock and Belichick paying the refs to call more penalties on the other team. One is gamesmanship, the other is outright cheating.
People are accusing the Dems/DNC/whomever of the latter when it's really just the former.
Quote:
Originally Posted by aoFrantic
You're also not beating Trump if your only message is "Trump is bad." That was the entire HRC election strategy! It explicitly failed! If you can't drum up enthusiasm for your candidate, you will lose. People like Warren have had over a year of campaigning to garner this enthusiasm. They have failed. They should drop out, and I say this as a fan of hers.
For the hundredth time, no this isn't what happened.
Using every bit of available data we have, Hillary, the boring, awful centrist who ran the awful campaign and spent more time in deep blue Californian than purple Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, would've won if not for Comey. Full stop.
She had a huge lead, lost it after the Comeybomb, finished right about where the polls said she would and won the popular vote by 3 million votes. She lost the electoral vote by 77,000 votes spread over 4 (crucial states).
America would've elected a dreaded centrist had Comey not done what he did. Dread it, run from it, reality arrives all the same.
We should still vote for Bernie because he's the best candidate and the reality of 2016 doesn't change that, but stop parroting the false narrative of what happened as support of what you want. Bernie's bona fides are enough on his own. It's the same line of thinking as the conspiracy ****. He doesn't need nonsense to win. He's more than strong enough on his own.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 72off
btw i love the arguments from the "vote blue no matter who" / "anyone but t" donks saying that which ever dem gets in will get mutombo'd by a gop sentate ... so if it doesn't matter then, support the front-runner with the biggest & most diverse base?
so weird how that is never the logical conclusion...
If anything it's reason to keep expectations reasonable. Bernie, correctly, doesn't want to eliminate the filibuster so he knows he's not going to force through M4A or a bunch of his other plans right away, but that's ok. He's still a voice for massive chance in the highest office in the land, and a lot of what he wants can be done by Executive Order.