Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics)

01-31-2017 , 12:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vhawk01
I mean the only possible reason to fire her is to send a message you wont be ****ed with. Firing her or not firing her are functionally the exact same thing, otherwise. So yeah its awful but its all of a kind.
Temper tantrum?
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:06 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holliday
Temper tantrum?
Well sure but thats just baseline at this point. Temper tantrum annnnndddd....Temper tantrum annnddddd.....
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:07 AM
He really is a horrible, horrible public speaker when not off the cuff. Sounds like the lead usher going up and reading a few passages.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:10 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
He really is a horrible, horrible public speaker when not off the cuff. Sounds like the lead usher going up and reading a few passages.
I mean literally every single news article you read about him or any captioning of any of his speeches or addresses are just ****ing gibberish. Its like everything he says is the fat guy who ran all the way to get help and is too out of breath to make sentences. I get nervous speaking in public but I still occasionally form real genuine sentences.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:14 AM
It's either Grandpa Simpson gibberish off the cuff, or 8th grade speech class from a B- student.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:16 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vhawk01
Trying to find some silver lining here, and I feel that the following are true and make me happy:

Practically overnight, American opinion on immigrants and refugees became collectively like 8 notches less disgusting and immoral, and that couldn't have happened without Trump. The ban sets us back a few decades superficially but advances us twice as much assuming it doesnt become some permanent thing.

Practically overnight, Americans realize the risks inherent in the gradual accumulation of power and erosion of checks and balances that has exemplified the executive for the last 80 years. This was a bad outcome, but it wasnt some unpredictable black swan event. The days of the worst thing about the President having so much power was that he was gonna enact the other guys pet policies instead of yours for 4 years are over.

Maybe thats meager solace, and obviously those can be wiped away if Hoya's lolchickenlittle fantasy comes true.

Well said.

Having said that, I am curious, and more than a bit skeptical, to see how well people remember the dangers of power concentrating in the Executive once they get Their Guy in the chair.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:18 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenewsavman
Well said.

Having said that, I am curious, and more than a bit skeptical, to see how well people remember the dangers of power concentrating in the Executive once they get Their Guy in the chair.

Yeah I'm grasping at straws
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:22 AM
congrats to obama for clinching worst and last president ever.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:29 AM
I need a quick, sharp line in response to the bolded part. i've already got the facts stuff down. TIA

Quote:
The question I have is, why didn't we show the same righteous anger towards a certain other administration when a) they did basically the same thing with Iraqi refugees in 2011, b) for the last eight years they were busy implementing the violent policies that were largely responsible for creating these refugees in the first place and c) they created the list of countries being used for the current ban under the 'Terror Travel Prevention Act'? Instead, we cried about said administration leaving the White House. Here's an idea - if we want to critique callousness, racism and xenophobia, critique it everywhere and not just where it's socially acceptable to do so.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:34 AM
A critique of callousness, racism, and xenophobia anywhere is a critique of callousness, racism, and xenophobia everywhere.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:37 AM
Disproportionately greater amounts of callousness, racism and xenophobia, such as those exhibited by the Trump administration's already-ruled-unconstitutional acts, demand louder and firmer censure and critique than the prior acts your false equivalency refers to.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:44 AM
No, you!
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:45 AM
Cheers, dudes. Already had something about false equivalency in, but I am no wordsmith.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan
I need a quick, sharp line in response to the bolded part. i've already got the facts stuff down. TIA
Are you already up to speed on the significant issues with (a) and (c)?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chips Ahoy
1. California has sufficient natural resources. The obvious fear is losing the Colorado River. Regardless, there is plenty of water for all the people and some of the agriculture with no changes in policy and without the Colorado River. If parts of the San Joaquin valley revert to desert, that's bad for the 20 people who own that land, but they were profiting on water projects made for people. It was free money and now it isn't.
I've stalled about halfway through reading Cadillac Desert, but given how apocalyptic it feels (and looking for prior discussion on the book on 2p2 I've seen that you read it as well) for water in California and the fact that the population has exploded a lot since it was written - is the issue just that agriculture is the biggest drain on CA's water resources, and as long as we scale back on that then 40 million people really can live here?
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:49 AM
I mean it depends on who the guy is. If its a Glenn Greenwald type, then just say, yeah sure, you are right. But next time you might want to focus on slamming the historically awful candidate through the election rather than say yeah they are terrible but will never win so no need to talk about them again.

If its a Trumpkin, then the appropriate response is 1) lol, or 2) good point, I agree we should protest callousness, racism, and xenophobia regardless of who is perpetrating it. You seem to be very well versed on these issues, so lead the way brother.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GTO2.0
I think there's a difference between a private client giving you a distasteful assignment which you are free to decline, and a DOJ lawyer whose putative duty is to uphold the constitution/seek justice/blah blah blah.

Like, the USA is her client - not Donald J. Trump. She's supposed to do what she thinks is right for the USA. If they don't like it, they can fire her. Which they did.
This is my take.

Also, she didn't refuse to defend because district court decided against the EO, she refused because she believed the EO was unconstitutional. If prosecutor pursues a case vs a defendant he believes is innocent that's breach of ethics and likely criminal, even if president says to pursue.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:54 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
Are you already up to speed on the significant issues with (a) and (c)?
Depends on your definition of up to speed, but i've got some good citations on the fact-checks of both of those points.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holliday
Is this the thread where we tell lawyers they don't know **** about the law or courts work? Because I want on that ****!
Seems like it's lawyers arguing with lawyers, but feel free to jump in.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 12:59 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan
Depends on your definition of up to speed, but i've got some good citations on the fact-checks of both of those points.
Sadly, facts don't matter, and fact checks are lol.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 01:06 AM
So I'm an active duty soldier with an immigrant wife. I feel like there's a nonzero chance I die in the next four years fighting someone in California while my wife watches the news in Asia because she can't get back into the country. Good times.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aidan
Depends on your definition of up to speed, but i've got some good citations on the fact-checks of both of those points.
This may be redundant then, but just in case:
- the 2011 thing has, like, one source on the entire internet which is an ABC News article from 2013 so it's hard for someone to suggest people should have been protesting something that wasn't even reported until refugees were already being accepted again
- the list of countries was not used by the Obama administration to block people from those countries, it was used as an exception to the Visa Waiver Program (the program through which people from places like the EU/Australia/etc can enter the US without a visa, and vice versa) - under that exception, people from visa-free countries (so not even the countries on that list) who had visited the countries on the list would be subject to extra scrutiny and had to get a visa in a situation where they otherwise wouldn't have. Trump was basically like "oh look, these countries are already enshrined in this other law used for different purposes so we can take advantage of that to just ban everyone from those countries"
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by goofyballer
I've stalled about halfway through reading Cadillac Desert, but given how apocalyptic it feels (and looking for prior discussion on the book on 2p2 I've seen that you read it as well) for water in California and the fact that the population has exploded a lot since it was written - is the issue just that agriculture is the biggest drain on CA's water resources, and as long as we scale back on that then 40 million people really can live here?
People use less than 20% of the fresh water. The total (not just rate) water used by people has been declining for a long time thanks to conservation regulations. People are less price sensitive to water. You need it and it's affordable.

Don't believe the signs you read on I5. Their lack of water is their problem. The CA aqueduct was paid for with special assessments on socal people water bills so socal people would have water. There isn't enough water to give a whole bunch away to farms south of Stockton, but there is plenty for people.

The northern part of the state flush with water and there's agriculture up there too.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 01:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chips Ahoy
Don't believe the signs you read on I5.
They slay me every time
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 01:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrWookie
Sadly, facts don't matter, and fact checks are lol.
Yeah, i think i am going to be the loser here for sure. I'm sure i'll cope with an unfriend and some awkward gym conversations.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
01-31-2017 , 01:19 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by niss
I'm not sure why you imply that this is a bad thing. We need *more* people in government standing up against this nonsense and empowering ordinary people to do the same. People in some kind of power should not only be resisting, but should be resisting loudly and publicly.
Let's not go overboard with the Shaun King style "Sally Yates is an American hero" type stuff just yet. As has been pointed out already, she was gone tomorrow no matter what.

I'd be a lot more impressed if she had ordered people to stand down over the weekend when everything was still up in the air. Presumably some relatively low-level DOJ employee had to walk into each of those District Courts and defend the EO while LPRs were still getting detained in airports all over the place.

She must have known about the suits, and probably had some hand in deciding what the position would be at the time. Would have been an order of magnitude more awesome if she had flown into EDNY and read that letter in open court, instead of basically leaking it on purpose via sending it to every single DOJ attorney in the system at 5PM the day before she gets canned.

Still better than just resigning without saying anything in this situation though.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote

      
m