So, we've already got repubs trying to pass a bunch of terrible things. Trump threatening everyone via twitter to do what he wants before he's actually president. Repubs now putting in a giant budget of waste to make the debt soar in the nuke obamacare bill so it'll get passed. Great.

All I've got is the smidge of enjoyment of corporations having to defend themselves by a tweet, about something they couldn't explain why without a giant wall of text.

The new official 25 page report heremostly goes into a rant about russia's TV station that nobody in the US watches, and concluded putin preferred trump, which gee, would he prefer the guy who wants to be his BFF and remove sanctions or the lady who wouldn't mind starting a war? Real tough one there.

NSA isn't as confident as the other groups, which is weird, they should know the literal names shouldn't they? I mean if I'm gonna pick out of the three on this issue...

Nobody likes tattletales, no matter how terrible the thing they're telling you. Snowden will always be a traitor for many. Think % it's the same atm with pardon/hang. Figure hang big fav in the lol olds crowd.

Also, hard to square 'Snowden good, Russia bad' if you consider where Edward's been the last 3 1/2 years...

Not really. And things aren't binary.

Well if we run the election again hil proly wins. She barely lost. All kinds of ways a few extra votes end up her way. Same with bern.

Another reason that we should have runoffs when lead vote getter receives <50% popular vote.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/...-report-finds/

Being met with "Intelligence Agencies are just big fat phonies" -- it's a weird reality we live in.

lol [citation needed]

guys, it's just a FORGONE CONCLUSION that we gotta be killin them brown people! We're CONTRACTUALLY OBLIGATED. No way outta it.

I'm not sure probability works this way, or at least, this is based on a ton of assumptions. If we ran it again, but kept what the same? Or if we just ran it again literally this coming Tuesday?

But I think I get your point and I agree. I think in the distribution of possible outcomes, both Clinton and Bernie had a ton of wins, Clinton definitely had more big wins.

Yeah it was a dumb post by me, sorry. I was referring to Gitmo. Which honestly isnt even a good response by me really even if my post wasn't confusing.

My goodness

Can't even tweet what he wants to tweet correctly

Our president is literally ******ed.

I would say it's a lot more of the right than "far right", but otherwise I agree with you. Which is not something I thought I would ever say.

i'm in the snowden should hang camp. 100%.

and there you have it

actions have consequences.

Drone strikes on anyone going 1 MPH over the speedlimit, right? there are RULES, people.

Morality is for losers, we don't need to examine the circumstances, all that's important is that a RULE WAS BROKEN and therefore someone needs to PAY.

the line is a dot to you

obama tried hard to close guantanamo. the american public and congress freaked out. there are not that many people left either http://www.cbsnews.com/news/four-gua...-saudi-arabia/

Yeah, I know, thats why I was saying it was a stupid point, made badly, by me.

i probably exaggerated a bit too. he could have tried harder tbf https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...re-republicans

I agree. The govt should have thought long and hard about the consequences of violating citizens constitutional right to privacy before they started spying on us illegally.

National Security Advisor Communications something appointee plagiarized a lot of her book

Response by transition team:

I'll admit to no longer having any idea what the real issues facing our country are. Libtards e-mails and vanity fair? The cyber? Crooked media? Celebrity Apprentice?