Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics)

12-07-2015 , 06:01 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
Then how did he?
He didn't. Assault rifles aren't the same as assault weapons, but the latter term was created to conflate the two in laymen. Pretty sure assault weapons are outlawed in California too. The guns used don't fall into either category
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ikestoys
He didn't. Assault rifles aren't the same as assault weapons, but the latter term was created to conflate the two in laymen.
Oh, well that changes everything then :eyeroll:
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:04 PM
So that Stasi editorial in NY Daily News is amongst the most vile things I've ever read.

But hey killer front page troll jobs nydn goat.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:04 PM
So he bought assault weapons, but not assault rifles?

What's the legal difference? I'm not doubting there is one.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:05 PM
No he didn't buy assault weapons either. That's a legal term invented in the 90s that these guns don't fall into either I believe.

Assault rifles are capable of full automatic fire.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:05 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Doesn't seem like something that could have been prevented IMO.
Maybe. Maybe not though.

Seems like there's at least a nonzero chance it would have been a different incident entirely if his neighbor would have not been able to buy two assault weapons legally.

Fixed for Ikes apparently.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:07 PM
Again, California has an assault weapon ban. These guns were not assault weapons
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:07 PM
Popehat wrote a well thought out piece regarding the competing echo chambers in gun debate.

http://www.popehat.com/2015/12/07/ta...ly-about-guns/
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:08 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
Doesn't seem like something that could have been prevented IMO.
Maybe. Maybe not though.

Seems like there's at least a nonzero chance it would have been a different incident entirely if his neighbor would have not been able to buy two highly deadly semi automatic rifles legally.

I'll try one more time. Maybe Ikes will find this wording acceptable even though it's 100% obvious to any non idiot what I meant.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:08 PM
Are all assault rifles assault weapons?
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:11 PM
Ikes probably so proud he just made me waste 3 posts saying literally the exact same thing to anyone with half a brain and ability to use common sense. Thanks for adding tons of value to the forum dude.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:13 PM
Actually his points are important and you're being a dick for no reason.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidcolin
Actually his points are important and you're being a dick for no reason.
How is it important what you call them? There is absolutely no difference between "assault rifle" "assault weapon" or "whatever those guns the killers neighbors legally purchased" in the context of the argument I was making.

Nor does there need to be.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:18 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
How is it important what you call them? There is absolutely no difference between "assault rifle" "assault weapon" or "whatever those guns the killers neighbors legally purchased" in the context of the argument I was making.
The purpose is so that gun nuts can claim victory when you call a magazine a "clip." Upon doing so, you will have been chessmated.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
Maybe. Maybe not though.

Seems like there's at least a nonzero chance it would have been a different incident entirely if his neighbor would have not been able to buy two highly deadly semi automatic rifles legally.

I'll try one more time. Maybe Ikes will find this wording acceptable even though it's 100% obvious to any non idiot what I meant.
Yes.

The right shotgun would be more lethal in a confined space.

Famously, Jules Winfield considered the shotgun superior for this exact task.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:31 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shane88888
Yes.

The right shotgun would be more lethal in a confined space.

Famously, Jules Winfield considered the shotgun superior for this exact task.
Not sure how confined the space was once the first shot goes off and everyone starts fleeing. And not sure how much not having the semi automatic rifles changes their plans. My only point was that Eddy said this might not have been avoidable and I disagree as I think there's at least a chance it might have been without the ease of acquiring two of those types of guns.

10 people dead is still much better than 14.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:35 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
Not sure how confined the space was once the first shot goes off and everyone starts fleeing. And not sure how much not having the semi automatic rifles changes their plans. My only point was that Eddy said this might not have been avoidable and I disagree as I think there's at least a chance it might have been without the ease of acquiring two of those types of guns.

10 people dead is still much better than 14.
Read Colin's link and then feel bad.

Also, you're forgetting about the pipe bombs.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:35 PM
It's so weird when people on a poker forum just throw their hands up and say it still could have happened with different laws. Humans can't think in terms of EV when it comes to ideology.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PocketChads
It's so weird when people on a poker forum just throw their hands up and say it still could have happened with different laws. Humans can't think in terms of EV when it comes to ideology.
It's like Paris never happened.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooders0n
Maybe. Maybe not though.

Seems like there's at least a nonzero chance it would have been a different incident entirely if his neighbor would have not been able to buy two highly deadly semi automatic rifles legally.

I'll try one more time. Maybe Ikes will find this wording acceptable even though it's 100% obvious to any non idiot what I meant.
Err you prescribed a specific solution, the obvious interpretation of what you said (assault rifle) was already outlawed. The secondary interpretation of you meant (assault weapon) was already outlawed. Even though you claim it is 'obvious to any non idiot what [you] meant', I doubt that even you know what type of gun you want to ban in response to this event.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shane88888
It's like Paris never happened.
What's does this even mean and how is it a response to PC's post?
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:39 PM
That's what I'm talking about, that's not sound reasoning on your part, Shane.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shane88888
Read Colin's link and then feel bad.

Also, you're forgetting about the pipe bombs.
That link was terrible. The goal is not to change the minds of gun supporters. Anyone who supports them at this point is not budging. The goal is to get anti-gun people, which happens to be largely the same group of people running ****, mad enough to force change.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ludacris
What's does this even mean and how is it a response to PC's post?
It's an intentionally obnoxious response to the vague and ineffectual arguments for non-specific "different laws."

Of course, I find these impotent suggestions far preferable to the President's newfound obsession with no-fly list.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
12-07-2015 , 06:50 PM
Death count EV of mass shootings by itself would be a tiny price to pay for whatever it is gun people want, to the point of near insignicance.

But there is a change in culture when people are afraid, however irrationally. Not sure how to measure that.

And of course it's a little irrational, but understandable, to focus on these sensational events instead of the "everyday" shootings.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote

      
m