Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics)

11-07-2016 , 08:26 PM
Being in Europe now, the wife and I plan to just spend tomorrow on Netflix and Chillary.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 08:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by heh
Being in Europe now, the wife and I plan to just spend tomorrow on CNN and Chillary.
.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 08:50 PM
Gonna get me some BRAHMA and watch TV in my São Paulo apartment. Will either celebrate or go fetal.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 08:55 PM
I know this post will get lol'd and whatever, so I am going to keep it short and sweet.

After looking at all of the information, I have decided to vote for Hillary Clinton. I'm not happy about it. I have always voted Republican. Because I have two small children, I feel it's my duty to vote for the person who is least likely to get us involved in a nuclear war.

I have no doubts on whether or not she will do a good job. Having been in office for 30+ years it would make sense that Hillary would have mistakes on her record, or things that could be used against her, who wouldn't in a 30 year span. I think she will continue to lead the greatest country in the world in the right direction, and we can revisit this in four years.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 08:57 PM
LOL

and whatever
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:00 PM
If he's telling the truth then that's about the most dick response you could give Gus.

The thread did it's job. If he's trolling then the joke's on him.

Kudos Eddy. If I'm being naive and this is a gotcha then whatev, I don't think that though.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:01 PM
Fills my heart with OPTIMISM.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
I know this post will get lol'd and whatever, so I am going to keep it short and sweet.

After looking at all of the information, I have decided to vote for Hillary Clinton. I'm not happy about it. I have always voted Republican. Because I have two small children, I feel it's my duty to vote for the person who is least likely to get us involved in a nuclear war.

I have no doubts on whether or not she will do a good job. Having been in office for 30+ years it would make sense that Hillary would have mistakes on her record, or things that could be used against her, who wouldn't in a 30 year span. I think she will continue to lead the greatest country in the world in the right direction, and we can revisit this in four years.
i hope you were included in the LATimes poll
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:13 PM
eddy... thank you
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:16 PM
It only takes 20,000 posts to change a vote. Go get em' Hoya.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:19 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by DodgerIrish
If he's telling the truth then that's about the most dick response you could give Gus.

The thread did it's job. If he's trolling then the joke's on him.

Kudos Eddy. If I'm being naive and this is a gotcha then whatev, I don't think that though.

Trust me, I liked the idea of Trump. I really did, I liked somebody who spoke his mind, and would disrupt the way things have been, but when it comes down to it, things really aren't bad. Hell, things are pretty freaking great. I read Hoya's post that made a lot of sense even though I am sure we disagree on a lot of things, but I don't mind paying a little higher taxes if it means more people will be able to enjoy the basic necessities of life.

I will never waiver on my beliefs and that our culture is becoming a tad ultra sensitive with SJW's which is kind of annoying, and we can fight about that stuff another day, but I am an American and I have always supported my president regardless of who it is.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:22 PM
eddy, good work keeping an open mind and listening to other people with different views

SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:23 PM
Hoya earning his keep round 'ere.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by EddyB66
I know this post will get lol'd and whatever, so I am going to keep it short and sweet.

After looking at all of the information, I have decided to vote for Hillary Clinton. I'm not happy about it. I have always voted Republican. Because I have two small children, I feel it's my duty to vote for the person who is least likely to get us involved in a nuclear war.

I have no doubts on whether or not she will do a good job. Having been in office for 30+ years it would make sense that Hillary would have mistakes on her record, or things that could be used against her, who wouldn't in a 30 year span. I think she will continue to lead the greatest country in the world in the right direction, and we can revisit this in four years.
Bad decision Eddy. Hillary is more likely to get us into war with Russia imposing a no fly zone in Syria. She is a war hawk, look at her voting history.

Russia flies over Syria and if Hillary wants to do that, it means we would have to shoot down a Russian Plane. Russia actually has nukes they could use on us, partly in thanks to Clintons helping them do a Uranium Deal.



http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/ma...me-a-hawk.html
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:25 PM
vmf... lol
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:30 PM
Quote:
The Uranium One deal was not Clinton's to veto or approve

Among the ways these accusations stray from the facts is in attributing a power of veto or approval to Secretary Clinton that she simply did not have. Clinton was one of nine cabinet members and department heads that sit on the CFIUS, and the secretary of the treasury is its chairperson. CFIUS members are collectively charged with evaluating the transaction for potential national security issues, then turning their findings over to the president. By law, the committee can't veto a transaction; only the president can. According to The New York Times, Clinton may not have even directly participated in the Uranium One decision. Then-Assistant Secretary of State Jose Fernandez, whose job it was to represent the State Dept. on CFIUS, said Clinton herself "never intervened" in committee matters.
http://www.snopes.com/hillary-clinto...m-russia-deal/

google is your friend
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:34 PM
Putin is quite good at twilight struggle, but if he launches nuclear war, he loses.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:48 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarianceMinefield
Bad decision Eddy. Hillary is more likely to get us into war with Russia imposing a no fly zone in Syria. She is a war hawk, look at her voting history.

Russia flies over Syria and if Hillary wants to do that, it means we would have to shoot down a Russian Plane. Russia actually has nukes they could use on us, partly in thanks to Clintons helping them do a Uranium Deal.



http://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/24/ma...me-a-hawk.html
You think Russia just recently got nukes? Seriously?
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:54 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarianceMinefield
Russia actually has nukes they could use on us, partly in thanks to Clintons helping them do a Uranium Deal.
Either you're trolling or this is the single stupidest thing I've ever read
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Holliday
You think Russia just recently got nukes? Seriously?
All the stuff they had during the cold war half-lifed away and they couldn't reup before Clinton handed them all the uranium in the world.
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 09:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by StoppedRainingMen
It astounds me these rubes think the guy holding his election night HQ in ****ing manhattan thinks Drumpf gives a **** about the little guy
uh
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 10:09 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by pvn
uh
I'm under no delusion WOAThill gives a **** about the little guy
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 10:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by El Rata
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...m-company.html

snopes is a joke it is also says "may not have". which could also say "may have"

my point is russia is more powerful because of the clintons, they have more nukes. not that they didnt have nukes before, you guys go out of the way to interpret posts incorrectly
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote
11-07-2016 , 10:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by VarianceMinefield
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...m-company.html

snopes is a joke it is also says "may not have". which could also say "may have"

my point is russia is more powerful because of the clintons, they have more nukes. not that they didnt have nukes before, you guys go out of the way to interpret posts incorrectly
It's true, nobody gives you the credit you deserve after racking up the gr8 discourse itt
SE Hoya Containment Thread (aka Politics) Quote

      
m