Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT

09-10-2017 , 07:56 PM
UPDATE: Waiver setting was borked, is now fixed, Game Time is now when a player hits waivers.

This means that even though I would like to add FA Alfred Morris right this instant, I will not do so because that seems unfair.

Last edited by CPHoya; 09-10-2017 at 08:01 PM.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-10-2017 , 10:43 PM
Van someone reinvite me to the chat, got a new phone and can't find the room
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-10-2017 , 11:49 PM
Quote:
If Zeke ends up having to serve the suspension I plug in McFadden for the 7 plays he gets in before he gets hurt again, and then I miss the playoffs.
Haha exactly my plan
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 10:31 AM
Picked up a kicker just so I can run up the score
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 10:39 AM
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 05:47 PM
There is a trade proposal in C League between Eddy and bus that includes sizable portions of team Free Agent Acquisition Budgets.

I do not have a problem with trades including FAABs as a trade-able asset.

Does anyone want to voice concern about that?

To make the trade work I have to manually adjust the budgets.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 05:49 PM
WOW
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 05:55 PM
Basically bus will send like $90 of FAAB to Eddy and a player or two, get back good players. Obvious result is Eddy will dominate waivers whenever he wants (like, for example, obviously, this valuable week).

Commence discussion.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 05:59 PM
WOW
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 06:21 PM
this trade itself shouldn't really matter in the decision to allow it or not. It should be a decision based on the theory of trading budgets in general
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 06:28 PM
if we do not hear anything we will likely proceed. THE deal is already agreed in principle.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 06:33 PM
WOW
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 06:52 PM
sorta rooting for a veto after what happened last week
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 06:53 PM
what other rule changes will C implement mid season
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 07:24 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteveSax
what other rule changes will C implement mid season
The mark of a good commissioner is the ability to make changes and adapt on the fly.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 07:40 PM
Is that something that yahoo has built in? Not in C but I'd say not allowed if it has to be manually manipulated
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 08:09 PM
lol k

fwiw if there arent a ton of objections after this first game we're going to go ahead and push it through. we dont have time for you guys to not care and waivers are first thing in the morning

eddy, hoya and myself are fine with it

etaL apparently they dont process until wednesday so you guys can fly in here and tell us how much you hate it

Last edited by 8bus; 09-11-2017 at 08:14 PM.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 09:08 PM
and if you guys veto this one after thielan maclin and sanders all outscore julio you can go **** yourselves
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 09:11 PM
I guess I didn't even know we could do the whole FAAB thing. Would have been cool to discuss before the season started, but we're here now.

I dunno about pushing the trade through without majority of the league saying go though. that's sort of typcal practice. You get my ok vote anyway.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 09:45 PM
Agree, should have been discussed beforehand. But I'm not going to object at this point.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 09:58 PM
WOW
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 10:21 PM
Anyone in C league opposed?
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 11:19 PM
It's not any different than if I just said hey Bus, can you bid on this guy I want. And then just make me a trade.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 11:22 PM
Well, it is, because you can now bid more than the theoretical $100 max, meaning you can acquire someone from waivers with no risk of being outbid.

Which he couldn't do if he was bidding for you.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote
09-11-2017 , 11:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by CPHoya
Well, it is, because you can now bid more than the theoretical $100 max, meaning you can acquire someone from waivers with no risk of being outbid.

Which he couldn't do if he was bidding for you.
Oh I never thought of that. Yeah no offence Bus, but that's a problem. I have no issue with reloading a FAAB back up to $100. But theoretical bids above $100 isn't how the league was set up or meant to play.

I don't think that's a very unreasonable observation either.
SE FACK FFB: LOL A League, LOL TUT Quote

      
m