Quote:
Originally Posted by AzAssassin
I just got done listening to what Max Kellerman had to say with regards to Pacquiao choosing to go ahead and fight after suffering a torn rotator cuff 3 weeks before the fight, and I completely agree with his thoughts. It's pretty much exactly how I felt about it after learning of Pacquiao's claim of being injured, but Kellerman stated it very nicely and clearly.
Kellerman brought up how the the injury apparently happened 3 weeks before the fight was scheduled to take place, after thousands of people's plans were already made, their hotel rooms and airfare booked and paid for, and with the hype for the event at a fever pitch. And how Pacquiao thought (and, apparently, had reason to believe) that he was going to be able to get the shot to help with the pain the night of the fight. Kellerman stated that if people should be mad at anyone, they should be mad at the athletic commission for not being willing to approve a reasonable request for the good of the fight/event/people. He made it sound Pacquiao's request was denied simply because he did not fill out a medical form correctly.
If this is true and accurate (with regards to the request being denied over a simple paperwork mistake), again, I am in complete agreement with what Kellerman said about Pacquiao doing nothing wrong by going ahead and choosing to fight last weekend.
Kellerman also mentioned how Pacquiao had not fought in 5 months, and that if he chose to go ahead with the surgery and postpone the fight, it would put him out of action for an additional year, which would make him inactive for 17 months before possibly facing Mayweather. And, Kellerman also brought up how Pacquiao very well/very likely may have lost his only shot at fighting Mayweather, if he were to cancel the fight and get the surgery beforehand.
So, as Kellerman asked as he ended his speech: What was Pacquiao supposed to do?
It's pretty BS. They didn't declare the injury bc they didn't want anyone to know about it. They didn't even declare it to the drug testing org (they just requested pain killers and were approved).
It's definitely not the commission's fault.
Arum, who is a clear Manny homer, even said it was "reinjured" in the 3rd round.
I think most likely thing is that he hurt his shoulder in sparring, but nowhere near bad enough to postpone the fight (not to mention risk the money).
It was fine prefight (Roach said it was doing great in the locker room, "f-ing beautiful" is how he described his right hook in the locker room iirc), but maybe it was additionally hurt after a few rounds.
What we saw in those few rounds pre alleged hurt was that Mayweather was clearly winning and Manny wasn't posing any real threat (mainly, not throwing enough volume to win most rounds).
It's the biggest non story ever, likely fueled by lucrative rematch potential, not to mention Manny's future earnings potential. Top Rank, Manny, Kontz, Kellerman (HBO), they all have a huge incentive to excuse this loss as best they can and to keep Manny earning as much as he can in the future.
The best quotes and most telling about this issue came right after the fight, when those involved (Arum, Roach in particular) didn't have as much time to create the most advantageous storyline. That's when you see the most truths.
There's a lot of damage control now from all the parties that have an interest in Manny, and that's what shapes Kellerman's arguments above.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperUberBob
I was finicky on 114-112 Burns or 113-113.
The most forgiving score I can give Figueroa imo is 114-112. No way he won more than 6 rounds.
Damn, thwarted again on a long shot (had Herrera over Garcia, that was worth a lot more though).
Quote:
Originally Posted by mutigers
I watched three fights today and you could have chosen one round of any of three fights and there was more action than the entire May Pac fight
They keep saying this (especially on HBO), but any sane boxing fan would've predicted 60-75% chance Floyd wins that fight and 90% of the time he wins it's by a decision. Manny hasn't knocked anyone out in many years too, why would this older, less powerful, fighting at higher weight version of himself be expected to KO the best defensive fighter he's ever faced?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mutigers
Cotto-Canelo is pretty much inevitable assuming Cotto wins in June
Agreed, except for the Floyd exception (Floyd Cotto rematch is prolly a top 4 likely fight for Floyd, worth a ton of money and Cotto is not with Arum anymore).
Quote:
Originally Posted by AzAssassin
If it does happen, who you got? And who do you want to win?
Also, do you think anyone in the weight-range of Golovkin beats him?
Maybe Ward at 168. Probably 2-3 guys at 175 (Kovalev, maybe Bieterbov and Stevenson), bc 175 is pretty heavy for GGG right now.
Nobody at 154 except possibly Floyd. Canelo prolly has the best shot of beating him at 154-160 otherwise and I don't think he has a great shot.