Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II)

11-13-2011 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG_LadyGaga
Mayweather is no hype job tho, the guy is hated by casual fan and is disliked by the media. But any fan of boxing can see with their own eyes just how skillful he is in the ring.
There are many things that make boxers great, being "skilful" is only one of them. Pacquiao has many attributes that Mayweather doesn't have and vice-versa.

There is a large section of casual fans that love Mayweather and believe his own hype that he is better than Ali, Robinson etc. Weirdly they seem to love his in-ring persona as well as his character outside the ring, which is strange considering that if you heard him talk. eg, "I'm a dog, i'm a gorilla, i'm a gorilla, i'm a dog" you would think he would fight like Tyson.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG_LadyGaga
But whatever this isn't about Pac-May, Marquez put on a great performance when he really has no business even fighting at 135. I hope he doesn't retire because he has a couple really good fights left. The majority of people know who really won last night and that will have to do since filipino gamblers fixed it? LOL
I assume you mean 144, otherwise that doesn't really make sense to me.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 09:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geddy Lee
You're making it sound like Marquez fought an impeccable fight. He didn't.

Palo's bang on: this was the worst fight of the 3, AINEC. I think it was an exceptionally tough fight to score.
He did tho. Solid game plan executed perfectly. The first two fights they were same size and can really put on fireworks. Pac is bigger and stronger now, JMM going in there toe to toe would just be stupid and he would have been finished early.

Marquez adjusts to his opponents beautifully. The first Diaz fight he had trouble with Diaz's legit effective aggression. Second fight he backed up and outboxed him from a distance, which is what he did to Pac last night. Obv vastly different fights tho.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 09:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJacket

I assume you mean 144, otherwise that doesn't really make sense to me.
Nope, he's a lightweight.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 09:53 PM
135 is lightweight. Are implying he shouldn't be fighting at lightweight?
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Couch Cushions
In a perfect world all of these people would watch the fight from a television feed with the sound off, but the boxing purists (read: the old guard) will never allow this to happen.
+1. Seems to me this was tried for a semi-important fight back in the 70s or 80s, but good luck finding out any details. Maybe some huge controversial CCTV fight was replayed on network TV and they had some people watch and score it in a quiet booth.

And WOATLOL Nacho. Unless the champ's been down a couple times and has his face all busted up you never tell your guy he's got it, esp after the first two fights. You can argue "gotta BEAT the champ" forever, but it's been the main fact of life in boxing forever.

I am trying to think of horrible decisions that went AGAINST the champ and can't really think of one, aside from Hagler-Leonard of course, which was a very difficult fight to score.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:11 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG_LadyGaga
He did tho. Solid game plan executed perfectly.
Until the final two rounds, which probably lost him the fight.

I mean, the LOL Nacho is so huge, it's astounding.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRm34eva
"Filipino gamblers are a large asset to Las Vegas. I am not surprised Manny won".
Well then, if was Vegas, I would've wanted JMM to get a very close split decision, keep all that Filipino 1-9 bridge jump money (unless the Mexican 9-1 flyer money was greater), and then have the rematch in April.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:23 PM
Kinda lol that if Pac-PBF does happen now in May, they'll both be coming off their worst and most controversial wins of their respective careers.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bill Murphy
Well then, if was Vegas, I would've wanted JMM to get a very close split decision, keep all that Filipino 1-9 bridge jump money (unless the Mexican 9-1 flyer money was greater), and then have the rematch in April.
the quote is from UK commentator Steve Bunce and he is as mad as a bottle of chips.

--

btw decisions like last night are commonplace in Boxing, ffs can hardly watch a show now without some controversy caused by bad refs or dumb judges.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:30 PM
Bunce is great, a lot of what he comes out with is nonsense but it's all entertaining.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iamreo
Out of curiosity, why?
Yeah i was skeptical before about Bob Arum wanting to risk his commodity (which Pac/Floyd both are unfortunately. They are more of a brand than fighters) before this fight.
That was mostly based on outlandish comments made by him suggesting they shouldn't fight Mayweather because his hateful persona and the things he says could jeopardize Mannys potential run for president.

Now, given that it's clear as day that Manny is still the fighter he was at his second fight against Marquez, and not this megaultraevolved superathlete. And is still highly likely to struggle against mobile fighters who can handle his speed and timing. Floyd seems like a complete nightmare opponent.

Fwiw, I'm not 100% certain Floyd or his camp want the fight either despite all of this. I'm just very certain Arum doesn't want it.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:38 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJacket
135 is lightweight. Are implying he shouldn't be fighting at lightweight?
No idea what hes implying, but i never thought Marquez looked very good even at 135. He had problems against both Juan Diaz and Katsidis at times.

Maybe hes old enough where he can't get below 135 anymore, but i think his best weight is clearly below that. Mannys too.

I don't like the way people on other forums discuss Marquez as being a future 147/140 fighter, and that he should fight berto, khan etc. Hes just not made for this weight. The reason he looked good against Pac is because of his style and the fact that he can constantly outsmart him.

Jmm vs Khan would be onesided in my opinion.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:40 PM
sweet triple poast.. sorry.

bradley is pretty much ****ed if pac fights marquez or floyd next.
Do you see him fighting Khan? Unfortunately, i don't.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:52 PM
Maybe he was refusing the Khan fight so he could chase the big money fight with Pac? Maybe now that the fight with Pac is off the table Khan becomes the next biggest available fight so he takes it. I'm not sure, I'm not too interested in the fight tbh.

Yes, Marquez was probably better at feather than lightweight but saying he had no business fighting at 135 is ridiculous.It's like saying SRR shouldn't have fought at middleweight or Duran at welterweight.

What's the deal with Cotto - Margarito? I heard they were having licence problems for Margarito, if that fight gets cancelled I will not be happy.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:54 PM
if they give Cotto plaster of Paris hand wraps i'll be happy.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 10:55 PM
Please don't compare duran at ww with marquez at 135.
I know you don't but still had to say it.

Margarito cotto is in jeopardy because of Margaritos eye. They are uncertain he will get a licence to fight in NYC.
I think i read that the decision will be made 2 weeks prior to the fight.

Can't believe this **** wasn't sorted beforehand, but thats boxing for you.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 11:20 PM
I just watched the face-off, it was great but I really want to punch Max Kellerman in the mouth.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 11:28 PM
cotto is icecool with his flashy ipad.

Gonna go buy one so i can show people the exact same pic. badass!
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJacket
135 is lightweight. Are implying he shouldn't be fighting at lightweight?
His best weight is clearly below 135. He only moved up to fight Casamayor and get bigger fights Diaz, Katsidis, etc. Which he didn't look particularly good in any despite being vastly superior skillwise due to fighting bigger guys. The fact that he legit beat Pac at 143 is pretty astounding. But probably more an indication of Pac's struggles with counter punching technicians than anything else. Meh woteva, Marga-Cotto i wasn't completely thrilled for; but that face-off has me kinda pumped up.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-13-2011 , 11:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJacket
I just watched the face-off, it was great but I really want to punch Max Kellerman in the mouth.
This i will completely agree with you.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-14-2011 , 11:21 AM
Watching fight now.

After 5 rounds I have it

10-9 Pac
10-9 JMM
10-10
10-10
10-9 JMM

Clearly not as much action as the previous 2 fights but still loving it. Emanuel Stewart is really annoying me tho, he gives no praise to JMM at all, all he can talk about his Pacquiao's speed.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-14-2011 , 11:56 AM
It's hard to imagine JMM retiring with such big pay days on the table (even if he can't get pacquiao I'm sure the fight with Morales could be made)

Trying to think of others that did it recently and the obvious first two that come to mind are Marvin Hagler and Lennox Lewis. Any others I'm missing?
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-14-2011 , 12:07 PM
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/video...04P680Z4pt1vY8

floyd says he will fight in february.
Not fighting Morales.



who knows. Cool if he does, but im not convinced.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-14-2011 , 12:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJacket
It's hard to imagine JMM retiring with such big pay days on the table (even if he can't get pacquiao I'm sure the fight with Morales could be made)

Trying to think of others that did it recently and the obvious first two that come to mind are Marvin Hagler and Lennox Lewis. Any others I'm missing?
Calzaghe?

Maybe there wasn't the big payday's for him tho?
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
11-14-2011 , 12:11 PM
calzaghe.. maybe, but he had dawson pretty much. Not a lot of money in it.

A rematch with hopkins i guess, but anyone really interested? The first fight was aids.

i would say prince nazeem still had a lot of money to be had. he just bailed.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote

      
m