Quote:
Originally Posted by trippy
webb, you're right. JMM had to convincingly win, and I don't think he did that. It was another "up in the air" fight, and the champion and aggressor is going to get the decision 9 times out of 10
Why did JMM have to convincingly win whereas Pac didn't?
When two title holders fight, which one has to convincingly win? What if one has 2 belts and the other has 1, does the person with 1 belt have to slightly win?
How about we just stick to awarding the fight to the winner of the fight.