Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II)

09-18-2011 , 11:33 AM
hatton vs floyd 24/7 = goat.

rest has been meh compared to it, especially Pacquiaos.

they should have done an 24/7 of margarito cotto instead. Or Wladimir haye. I realize why they don't though.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 11:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitchface
Well Ortiz arguably should have been DQd for that headbutt and at the very least had a point deducted. It wasn't a normal fake-incidental butt. That was one of the most vicious, blatant, and egregious headbutts I've seen in a long time. **** Ortiz.
yea, he deserved to get DQed for that headbutt, there's just too much on the line for boxing and everyone else for the ref to end the fight that way

it was a cheap shot, but a deserved cheap shot, you don't need to hug 9 times
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 11:45 AM
Haye-Wladimir would have been epic. Obviously it would leave people feeling even more disapointed after watching the actual fight though.

To me it looks like Pacquiao and Floyd are both past their primes, the days of us being wowed by either of them may well be over.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 12:00 PM
i was wowed by floyd last night. He looked incredibly sharp and accurate. And went on the offense (floyd throwing combinations, omg is this 2001?)
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 12:32 PM
the next guy to fight $may should just pull out all the cheap shots imo
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 12:44 PM
how people can't see this is rigged is beyond me.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 12:49 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingofcool
i was wowed by floyd last night. He looked incredibly sharp and accurate. And went on the offense (floyd throwing combinations, omg is this 2001?)
meh, I wasn't really impressed. I would be annoyed if i paid $50 for that, Ortiz didn't seem to care afterwards. I wonder if he was really there to win?

From here I think Floyd goes underground before calling out Khan after he moves up to 147.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 12:50 PM
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 12:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by AcTiOnJaCsOn
i get why people hate floyd for a multitude of reasons but i dont get how people could hate him for wanting strict testing.
The argument is mostly "Stricter testing is great, just don't come up with it on your 41st fight against your toughest opponent (who has never failed a drug test)."

Right or wrong, if reeks of excuses.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 12:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJacket
meh, I wasn't really impressed. I would be annoyed if i paid $50 for that, Ortiz didn't seem to care afterwards. I wonder if he was really there to win?
Ortiz didn't care because he knew he was going to lose most likely. He was probably even on cards at that point (not counting the deduction) but he wasn't going to keep that up going forward.

His corner probably told him his check cleared, and he was done.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 12:56 PM
Ortiz is a ****ing moron and it showed last night. Whatever, he was way in over his head anyways. Floyd looked really, really sharp, but again...was this fight ever a legitimate threat?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitchface
42-0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitchface
If Merchant was 50 years younger he would have been #43.
Merchant would've been his hardest fight out of the last 10, so at least it'd be an increase in quality of competition.

Mayweather GOAT claims are beyond laughable at this point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by AcTiOnJaCsOn
i get why people hate floyd for a multitude of reasons but i dont get how people could hate him for wanting strict testing.
Because it's far beyond what the NSAC requires to sign off on a prizefight. Mayweather never seemed to have a problem with the NSAC regulations for the majority of his career, until Pacquiao came into the picture.

He's not an idealistic crusader. He's a bitch. An extremely talented bitch, but a bitch nonetheless.

Ortiz got what he deserved but Mayweather's legacy is getting severely tarnished at this point. People are quite rightly fed up with him.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geddy Lee
Ortiz is a ****ing moron and it showed last night. Whatever, he was way in over his head anyways. Floyd looked really, really sharp, but again...was this fight ever a legitimate threat?





Merchant would've been his hardest fight out of the last 10, so at least it'd be an increase in quality of competition.

Mayweather GOAT claims are beyond laughable at this point.



Because it's far beyond what the NSAC requires to sign off on a prizefight. Mayweather never seemed to have a problem with the NSAC regulations for the majority of his career, until Pacquiao came into the picture.

He's not an idealistic crusader. He's a bitch. An extremely talented bitch, but a bitch nonetheless.

Ortiz got what he deserved but Mayweather's legacy is getting severely tarnished at this point. People are quite rightly fed up with him.
so much awful
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 01:05 PM
should stick to hockey geddy imo
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 01:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by C-Viggity
so much awful
Which points do you disagree with? I really hope it's not regarding his GOAT claims.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 01:38 PM
What an unreal finish that was.

Always been a big Larry Merchant fan and that was probably his most epic performance ever.

Don't think Mayweather looked THAT good if held up against previous lofty standards. Ortiz was a sucker for his straight punches, without any sickening hand speed coming from Mayweather, and while his own defense was crafty I'm not so sure about his general speed and reflexes. He was hittable basically. More so in than in the past (with a danger of stating the obvious) and I doubt that's something which will increase any motivation to ever face Pacquiao.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by LanXang
This absolute slayed me.

So So good
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 01:54 PM
I don't really follow boxing but I'm really confused about the sentiment that Floyd somehow wronged Ortiz by knocking him out when the fight was on. If it's a sucker punch the ref would've DQ'ed him right? How is it classless to knock your opponent out when the fight is on? IMO this is like a pro sports team whining about their opponent running up the score. If you were playing better this wouldn't have happened.

I can see blaming the ref for starting the fight and still looking ringside, but why was what Floyd did cheap?
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 02:04 PM
Because the opponent clearly did not think it was on critikal.

Nevertheless, Ortiz not only went for a terribly obvious headbutt just before, but then tried to hit him 1-2 times after that headbutt (why doesn't anybody mention that?).

Tough to feel sorry for a guy that would do that (lucky for Floyd he dodged his shots both before and after the headbutt).

It's disappointing though, if you wanted this garbage WWE does it better. I wanted to see some boxing, decisions are fine, not every fighter is Mike Tyson.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 02:12 PM
After Floyd went off on Merchant, I thought "Boy, Sklansky sure is lucky he didn't piss Floyd off too much in that DUCY story." We can all agree David was probably > 1% at one point to get beaten up by Floyd, based on that story.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 02:20 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoRy
Because the opponent clearly did not think it was on critikal.

Nevertheless, Ortiz not only went for a terribly obvious headbutt just before, but then tried to hit him 1-2 times after that headbutt (why doesn't anybody mention that?).

Tough to feel sorry for a guy that would do that (lucky for Floyd he dodged his shots both before and after the headbutt).

It's disappointing though, if you wanted this garbage WWE does it better. I wanted to see some boxing, decisions are fine, not every fighter is Mike Tyson.
Good point. Looking at the replay of the last headbutt again, you'll see that PBF looks at the ref while Ortiz hits him again. Much like PBF, only illegal.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 02:21 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by critikal
I don't really follow boxing but I'm really confused about the sentiment that Floyd somehow wronged Ortiz by knocking him out when the fight was on. If it's a sucker punch the ref would've DQ'ed him right? How is it classless to knock your opponent out when the fight is on? IMO this is like a pro sports team whining about their opponent running up the score. If you were playing better this wouldn't have happened.

I can see blaming the ref for starting the fight and still looking ringside, but why was what Floyd did cheap?
its a sucker punch even if its legal

Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoRy
Nevertheless, Ortiz not only went for a terribly obvious headbutt just before, but then tried to hit him 1-2 times after that headbutt (why doesn't anybody mention that?).
not sure I get your point...
until the ref pulls him off why would he stop punching?

headbutts happen all the time
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 02:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChicagoRy
Because the opponent clearly did not think it was on critikal.
Still doesn't make sense how that's Floyd's fault.

So Floyd knew the fight was on but Ortiz didn't, and that's somehow Floyd's fault but not Ortiz's?

In football, no one blames the WR for getting up and running to the endzone when there's no whistle and the DB thinks the play is down by contact. Is he supposed to "be a gentleman" and wait for the DB to get up? Part of your job as a professional athlete is awareness.
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 02:26 PM
the vast majority of boxers with class wouldnt have hit ortiz there

/discussion
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 02:29 PM
Maybe, but then again they are not samurai, right?
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote
09-18-2011 , 02:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirbynator
the vast majority of boxers with class wouldnt have hit ortiz there

/discussion
/boxing
SE Boxing Thread (not waiting for PBF v. Pac II) Quote

      
m