Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade

11-13-2009 , 07:56 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Assani Fisher
+1

Its perfectly reasonable to "force" a throw there. Theres only been such a reaction to it because it was his 5th of the night, and it was only his 5th of the night because Hester fell down on a route and Olsen gave up inside position after the ball was already in the air.
And Devin Hester ran into a referee.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thremp
Brees has better talent. But does that create the entire difference in outcomes? The Bears have/had better defense IIRC than the Saints. Does that not factor into relevant numbers?
no not the entire range, b/c brees is much better than cutler. as far as defense goes the bears d played well last night but over the course of the season it has been at least as bad the saints d was in the previous few years
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by <3_Tha_Grind
And Devin Hester ran into a referee.
First, It's Matt Forte who bumped into the ref..not Hester.

Second, lol of course they would be better with Brandon Marshall than Devin Hester.

Last edited by Tbird05; 11-13-2009 at 08:17 PM. Reason: whoever thinks Orton>Cutler is mildly retarded.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thremp
This isn't what I'm saying at all and a gross misrepresentation.

Attributing success in the passing game is divided in some way between QB/Receiver, there may or may not be synergy in the passing game, and its currently unknown. There is a greater chance that Colston languishes down on the depth chart, in camp etc if he has a ****ty QB. He's had a extremely good career even adjusting for a bad assessment of his talent level so far. How much of that is his own skill vs that of the QB is currently unknown.

Brees has better talent. But does that create the entire difference in outcomes? The Bears have/had better defense IIRC than the Saints. Does that not factor into relevant numbers?
see i dont know if the bolded is true or not. the next point makes sense. his numbers are certainly inflated bc of brees. but that doesnt matter in comparison to other wr on his team.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:24 PM
So if Cutler continues to suck it's because he has no weapons. If he gets better it's because they got him some weapons. Must be nice for him to have his own skills completely absent from the discussion.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbird05
First, It's Matt Forte who bumped into the ref..not Hester.

Second, lol of course they would be better with Brandon Marshall than Devin Hester.
I'm like 98% sure it was Hester seeing as he was the intended receiver on the crossing route.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by <3_Tha_Grind
I'm like 98% sure it was Hester seeing as he was the intended receiver on the crossing route.
I thought Hester slipped running his route that caused the pick. Cutler was checking it down to Forte mid-field when he bumped in the ref. I could be wrong...

Last edited by Tbird05; 11-13-2009 at 08:39 PM. Reason: confirmed Hester
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:36 PM
It was Hester, he just stopped and threw his hands up. He def. could have done a better job getting around the ref to the ball. Ridiculous move by the ref too.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:48 PM
Cutler definately was a big part of the loss to the 49ers last week.

He threw three picks in the first half of game 1 vs. the Packers. Cutler would have had the game winning drive if Nathan Vasher didn't get burnt at the end. He came through in the Steelers game to get the victory. They could have started the season 4-0.

The Bears defensive gave up 5 td's in a row to the Bengals and would have done the same against the Cardinals if it weren't for halftime. You can't put any blame on Cutler because they had no chances in those games.

That just leaves the Browns and Falcons game. He didn't look good against the Browns, but then again it was an easy W. I think he did okay in a close loss in Atlanta.

I guess what I'm trying to say is he hasn't been as bad as it looks on paper. We'll have to see how he responds with the Eagles and Vikings coming up.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 08:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by <3_Tha_Grind
I'm like 98% sure it was Hester seeing as he was the intended receiver on the crossing route.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tbird05
I thought Hester slipped running his route that caused the pick. Cutler was checking it down to Forte mid-field when he bumped in the ref. I could be wrong...
its all 3. hester and forte both got cut off by refs on ints, and the hester slip
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 09:06 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thremp
This isn't what I'm saying at all and a gross misrepresentation.

Attributing success in the passing game is divided in some way between QB/Receiver, there may or may not be synergy in the passing game, and its currently unknown. There is a greater chance that Colston languishes down on the depth chart, in camp etc if he has a ****ty QB. He's had a extremely good career even adjusting for a bad assessment of his talent level so far. How much of that is his own skill vs that of the QB is currently unknown.

Brees has better talent. But does that create the entire difference in outcomes? The Bears have/had better defense IIRC than the Saints. Does that not factor into relevant numbers?
Well, I think Colston wouldn't be putting up much in the way of numbers if, say, JaMarcus Russell was his QB, but the other things I've mentioned-- size and strength, route running, and sure hands-- are observable and the sort of things that correlate well with being a successful receiver in any situation. He's basically the opposite of Troy Williamson.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 09:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MEbenhoe
Manning, Brady, Brees, Roethlisberger, Rivers, Rodgers, Schaub, Flacco, Palmer, and Ryan for sure.
Kyle Orrton
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 09:53 PM
The funny part is where if you have Cutler he needs a good offensive line, a great #1 receiver, a quality running game, etc. This sounds shockingly like the arguments made for why Kyle Orton is succeeding. If Cutler were elite he would elevate those around him, all great QBs do this. He wouldn't be on pace to throw 32 interceptions.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 09:53 PM
except?

Last edited by GeoffRas22; 11-13-2009 at 09:53 PM. Reason: oh snap but maybe!
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 09:54 PM
Sorry I meant 34 interceptions.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 10:07 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by vixticator
The funny part is where if you have Cutler he needs a good offensive line, a great #1 receiver, a quality running game, etc. This sounds shockingly like the arguments made for why Kyle Orton is succeeding. If Cutler were elite he would elevate those around him, all great QBs do this. He wouldn't be on pace to throw 32 interceptions.
no, he just needs better than a bottom 5 OL

pace and williams might be giving the worst performance of any pair of tackles in the league right now

Last edited by SMIGLET; 11-13-2009 at 10:17 PM.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 10:07 PM
grunching. I used to think all the Bears QBs sucked, now I'm wondering if QBs just can't succeed under their system.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 10:15 PM
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 10:29 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SMIGLET
no, he just needs better than a bottom 5 OL

pace and williams might be giving the worst performance of any pair of tackles in the league right now
Okay, I don't disagree. These receivers and runners should be good enough. Hester is underrated here. Knox is a quality player. Bennett is a fine #3. Olsen is well above average. Forte is slightly above average as an all around weapon. An elite QB gets by with these players fine. McNabb played with an absolutely laughable supporting cast for near his entire career. Asking the Bears to surround him with elite playmakers immediately is ridiculous.

Offensive line, sure he needs this to be near average and it isn't.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 10:34 PM
But my main point is nobody would call Cutler a good QB without knowledge of his play with the Broncos. Everyone admits the Broncos have an elite offensive line and weapons in the receiving game. This is why Kyle Orton looks a lot better. Ok, fine. Agreed. None of you Cutler guys are saying the Broncos made him better than he actually is, double standard.
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-13-2009 , 10:36 PM
ya the skills positions are solid, and more importantly young, the bears are fine in this regard.

right now they just dont have anyone who can edge pass protect, and they dont have have any good run blockers

and yes obviously the broncos team made him better, are we not all agreeing that the broncos might actually be as good as assani thinks if the trade never happened?
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-14-2009 , 12:03 AM
bears recipe for off seasons success:
1)throw piles of money at Marcus McNeill, Jahri Evans and Brandon Marshall
2)profit
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-14-2009 , 12:05 AM
i doubt more than one of those guys will not be re-signed by their respective teams (and most likely none of them will be available)
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-14-2009 , 12:06 AM
a guy can hope :/ Marshall leaving doesn't seem unreasonable
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote
11-14-2009 , 12:06 AM
Word from Denver is Marshall is likely to be re-signed.

Pat Bowlen said he was "Playing himself into a large contract".
Revisiting the Jay Cutler trade Quote

      
m