Quote:
Originally Posted by Thremp
This isn't what I'm saying at all and a gross misrepresentation.
Attributing success in the passing game is divided in some way between QB/Receiver, there may or may not be synergy in the passing game, and its currently unknown. There is a greater chance that Colston languishes down on the depth chart, in camp etc if he has a ****ty QB. He's had a extremely good career even adjusting for a bad assessment of his talent level so far. How much of that is his own skill vs that of the QB is currently unknown.
Brees has better talent. But does that create the entire difference in outcomes? The Bears have/had better defense IIRC than the Saints. Does that not factor into relevant numbers?
Well, I think Colston wouldn't be putting up much in the way of numbers if, say, JaMarcus Russell was his QB, but the other things I've mentioned-- size and strength, route running, and sure hands-- are observable and the sort of things that correlate well with being a successful receiver in any situation. He's basically the opposite of Troy Williamson.