Quote:
Originally Posted by Vael
agassi made a slam final at age 35 (losing to fed) and won a slam at age 33 so if fed can't match that I don't think he makes the top 5 players of all time
Agassi stumbled through that tournament and played a bunch of scrubs. Facing James Blake as a WC in the quarters and a non-seeded player in the semis was easier than Murray's draw for Wimbledon. He also played a bunch of scrubs in his 2003 win and was lucky to fade Roddick in the finals who probably lost his semi match because of an extremely long QF match he played.
Fed has to go through Rafa, Novak, or Murray and often a combination of two just to win something. It's not even valid to use these facts considering how much better the competition is today and how Agassi got so far because of two easy draws.
But this is just obvious trolling. The write up is for others to see why Agassi had some success at that age.