Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport

12-07-2012 , 03:40 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quadstriker
Pretty exciting stuff, really.

Wat the hell is that?
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 03:50 AM
Lol Canada. Plays like that seem super fluky and high variance IMO.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 04:02 AM
touchbacks are a point for the opposing team in Canadian football
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 04:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirRawrsALot
Lol Canada. Plays like that seem super fluky and high variance IMO.
That happens about as often as a successful Hail Mary. Not a typical play, but I do love when teams line up a kicker in the end zone to kick out the missed field goal.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 05:39 AM
Why do they have to kick out a missed FG? If they don't, it's a point for the other side?

Also, I would love the NFL to have bigger end zones. But not that big.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 05:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
Why do they have to kick out a missed FG? If they don't, it's a point for the other side?
yes, like Krayz said touchbacks are worth 1 point for the kicking team, so given the game was tied with no time left the defending team had to get it out of their endzone to force OT, and if you can't run it out then you gotta kick it out

Quote:
Also, I would love the NFL to have bigger end zones. But not that big.
yeah endzones are 20 yards, so more room for creativity down in the redzone
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 05:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dominic
Why do they have to kick out a missed FG? If they don't, it's a point for the other side?

Also, I would love the NFL to have bigger end zones. But not that big.
A missed field goal that is kicked through or downed in the end zone is worth one point. The receiving team can run it out or kick it out to avoid the kicking team from scoring the single (called a rouge).
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 07:55 AM
Can you kick the ball forward like the kicker for the Alouettes did when he got the ball back on any play? Looks rugbyish to a noob like me.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 08:04 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by yeotaJMU
except in 1 system (current) your offense is on the field in the high leverage situation and in the other system your defense is on the field.
No, your offense isn't on the field in either system. That's the whole point. The only difference is that in the new system, your defense would be on the field instead of the hands team for one play.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 08:16 AM
That CFL video is honestly the dumbest thing I've ever seen
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 08:33 AM
worst rule in the NFL is that two professional teams can tie. Play till one team scores and holds the other team..
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 10:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SirRawrsALot
I like Schiano's idea, also, however I doubt it ever flies. I think the 'casual' fan would hate it.
I consider myself way more than a casual fan and I hate it immensely--I just think it's too fundamental of a change. Oddly, I do kind of like the idea of having a scrum to determine initial possession at the beginning of halves/OT, mainly because it replaces a silly luck-based element (coin toss)...that would eliminate a couple of kickoffs per game, at least.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 10:39 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by OpusOne
worst rule in the NFL is that two professional teams can tie. Play till one team scores and holds the other team..
No way. The worst rule is tie breakers to determine post season seeding. Ties during the season allows for more unique outcomes. Deceases the chances of ties for seeding.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 10:42 AM
The NFL wants to end kickoffs. What's the injury rate during kickoffs? Is it much higher than during normal plays?
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 11:21 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by neg3sd
The NFL wants to end kickoffs. What's the injury rate during kickoffs? Is it much higher than during normal plays?
The graph here has stats.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 11:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by neg3sd
No way. The worst rule is tie breakers to determine post season seeding. Ties during the season allows for more unique outcomes. Deceases the chances of ties for seeding.
How do you propose to seed tied teams without some sort of tiebreaker?
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 11:30 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggymcfly
It's not actually a rule change, but don't get me started on how awful the NFL camera angles are. They came up with the whole "zoom in on the line and the QB from the side" angle back when teams ran the ball 60% of the time and the average TV was a 14 incher. Now that people have 60" inch flat screens, the default HD angle really needs to be from behind the quarterback so we can actually watch the routes develop downfield instead of just seeing the WR and DB come into frame 1 second before the ball reaches them. Would make the NFL 5x more watchable IMO. I'd go so far as to say that if either the NCAA or the NFL adopted this as the go-to camera angle, I'd pretty much watch that league exclusively until the other one followed suit.
ohhhhhhhh wow i never even thought of that, and im a pretty big fan of endzone seats. its not just the downfield stuff either, its much better for watching speedy RBs trying to turn the corner, WRs playing along the sidelines, screen plays where you can tell who actually has an angle on the ball carrier, etc. the angle of the sideline view kind of squishes the field and distorts depth perception.

+1 million

someone start a twitter campaign or email bill simmons or something
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 11:31 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlk9s
How do you propose to seed tied teams without some sort of tiebreaker?
I think that's a necessary evil (unless you want to have some high-variance mini-game between tied teams, where you just play a college-style OT or something). I think neg3sd's point is just that there's a very limited number of possible records, which is why ties are actually good (I liked the idea of an 18-game season for the same reason). It kinda sucks when there are five or six 10-6 teams in a conference, and half the berths/seeding are determined just by tiebreaker.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 12:15 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggymcfly
It's not actually a rule change, but don't get me started on how awful the NFL camera angles are. They came up with the whole "zoom in on the line and the QB from the side" angle back when teams ran the ball 60% of the time and the average TV was a 14 incher. Now that people have 60" inch flat screens, the default HD angle really needs to be from behind the quarterback so we can actually watch the routes develop downfield instead of just seeing the WR and DB come into frame 1 second before the ball reaches them. Would make the NFL 5x more watchable IMO. I'd go so far as to say that if either the NCAA or the NFL adopted this as the go-to camera angle, I'd pretty much watch that league exclusively until the other one followed suit.
I agree, I'd love to see this angle broadcast to be able to see into the secondary downfield. The advantages for game analysis are clear.

But, this angle would also disappoint in certain spots. For example, when a RB gets in behind the OL will block the shot. A lot of DL play will be shielded by the OL. And, the ball running away from the camera effect. It doesn't capture the speed of the players.

And, unless you have the capability to get wide angle and do everything from the Sky Cam, you run into the issue of feasibility. The goalposts and blocking the view from fans in the stadium are the 2 big obstacles. Time to invent a self-stabilizing flying camera imo.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 01:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by dlk9s
How do you propose to seed tied teams without some sort of tiebreaker?
You absolutely need tie breakers. Allowing ties during the regular season games would create more possible outcomes, less need to use the tie breaker rules. One win should be worth more than two ties.

This year there may be a three-way tie in the AFC for 2-4 seed.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 01:27 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rei Ayanami
The graph here has stats.
Thanks, nice graph. Seems like injuries are trending up for all plays other than field goals. Players are getting bigger and stronger. They need to change the rules on tackling. No throwing the body like a missile into the player with the ball. Arms must be away from the body(your own body).
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-07-2012 , 11:54 PM
A CFL rule I would like to see is the onside punt.

There is no fair catch in the CFL, but the kicking team has to give the returner a 5 yard bubble.

The good part of no fair catch or downing punts is that the punter and anyone lined up behind him at the time of the kick is onside, so they can recover the ball.

Makes for some pretty interesting gadget plays on offense as well.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-08-2012 , 12:25 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryant Reeves
yes, like Krayz said touchbacks are worth 1 point for the kicking team, so given the game was tied with no time left the defending team had to get it out of their endzone to force OT, and if you can't run it out then you gotta kick it out



yeah endzones are 20 yards, so more room for creativity down in the redzone
Why did the Alouettes try a field goal? Why didn't they just punt it into the stands through the end zone for 1 point?
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-08-2012 , 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Uncle Wimp
Why did the Alouettes try a field goal? Why didn't they just punt it into the stands through the end zone for 1 point?
They may have been down by one, so the single would only tie. If the game was tied, that would be a solid start.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote
12-08-2012 , 01:11 AM
I just realized that CFL rules probably seem like a huge level to people who didn't grow up with then.
Post a rule change that you think would improve a sport Quote

      
m