Quote:
Originally Posted by Aloysius
Well then - if you're not a criminal lawyer, why is it relevant you're a lawyer regarding the strength of a confession in a criminal matter?
First, I, like everyone, believe that Sandusky is guilty as sin.
I do know a little something about evidence and trial work though. What they got out of Sandusky, while compelling in terms of evidence suggestive of his guilt, is not a garden variety "confession" by definition. A confession is "yes I did it" type of stuff. That isn't what they got here.
Semantics really but worthy to note nonetheless.
And the relevance of my being a lawyer is nothing more than a shameless barg LDO.