Quote:
Originally Posted by SarcasticRat
I think getting different styles and perspectives in the rankings is interesting, and is typically what leads to discussion and debate in the threads. Beyond that, the real bad posters are the ones who constantly get furious over his rankings (usually homers) when they could just ignore them or post their own.
But iggy is so inflexible, week after week posting bad analysis based on cherry-picked stats, that he's no longer providing "interesting perspective" and is instead making it easy to tune him out or reflexively dismiss his arguments.
Even if his rankings are closer to Vegas' or whatever, his methodology for arguing his points is so bad that he's not a positive contributor to discussion. (FWIW, neither are people like phb who are just totally furious that some random goober on the internet doesn't recognize the greatness of the Texans.)