Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters?

01-10-2011 , 12:46 AM
SnotBoogy
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnotBoogy
anyone who says seattle was a historic upset is a fool. saitns have been meh all year, coming off the superbowl (hunger factor), and seattle has quite the home field advantage with the crowd.

spread was 10 and i was all over it, shoulda been like -5 for new orleans, -7 max imo
Ya, Vegas was definitely off 5 points on an NFL game.
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 12:57 AM
im sure snot was saying that when it was 10-0 and looked like the saints were gonna roll by 30, crowd just had to warm up, and obviously the hunger factor sets in after the first quarter
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 01:02 AM
if it wasn't for that great home field advantage, the Giants would have beaten the Seahawks by 60
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 01:03 AM
lol maybe it was that big of an upset if that many clowns thought the saints were invincible
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 01:03 AM
cashgamepoker500 should be more ashamed of his Alan Meltzer avatar than his posting. Dudes that look like white Jabba the Hutt do not make for good avatars.
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 01:09 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnotBoogy
lol maybe it was that big of an upset if that many clowns thought the saints were invincible
well they did beat the second best team in the conference on the road
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 03:46 AM
I think it was Dudd earlier who said something along the lines of "these NFL playoff threads bring 1 otherwise unknown troll out of the woodwork for each team".
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 03:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by chim17
Ya, Vegas was definitely off 5 points on an NFL game.
actually i think that they were like 15-16 points off, DUCY?!?
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 03:51 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnotBoogy
anyone who says seattle was a historic upset is a fool. saitns have been meh all year, coming off the superbowl (hunger factor), and seattle has quite the home field advantage with the crowd.

spread was 10 and i was all over it, shoulda been like -5 for new orleans, -7 max imo
oh my god. lawl.
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 04:32 AM
sigh

I guess Malcolm Jenkins WAS a big Pro Bowl snub!
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 04:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by prohornblower
I think it was Dudd earlier who said something along the lines of "these NFL playoff threads bring 1 otherwise unknown troll out of the woodwork for each team".
i think that was me
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 04:37 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnotBoogy
spread was 10 and i was all over it, shoulda been like -5 for new orleans, -7 max imo
yeah you were all over it for $100 -- congrats bro
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 08:46 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by nath
sigh

I guess Malcolm Jenkins WAS a big Pro Bowl snub!
Not having him did suck hard though, our secondary was so lol
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 09:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnotBoogy
anyone who says seattle was a historic upset is a fool. saitns have been meh all year, coming off the superbowl (hunger factor), and seattle has quite the home field advantage with the crowd.

spread was 10 and i was all over it, shoulda been like -5 for new orleans, -7 max imo
lawl.
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 01:47 PM
^ the guy above me is pretty terrible
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 02:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by agdci981
^ the guy above me is pretty terrible
+1?

(nah, j/k, but someone had to do it.)
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 02:08 PM
Excellent work tuq on The B, nailing him before he was even mentioned itt
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 02:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by agdci981
^ the guy above me is pretty terrible
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 03:10 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
Excellent work tuq on The B, nailing him before he was even mentioned itt
didn't think I'd have a reason to ever post in this this thread, but to this
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 03:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NozeCandy
Not having him did suck hard though, our secondary was so lol
Yeah, I was being serious. I had no idea that the dropoff was so bad that Mike Williams and Ben Obomanu would be routinely roasting our secondary.
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 03:24 PM
Tyler Durden
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 03:26 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dudd
Excellent work tuq on The B, nailing him before he was even mentioned itt
indeed, although the B did post itt a couple weeks ago

Quote:
Originally Posted by The B
delusional UNC Tarheel fans, all of them
projection ftl
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-10-2011 , 07:39 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SnotBoogy
lol maybe it was that big of an upset if that many clowns thought the saints were invincible
7-9 man.
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote
01-11-2011 , 01:39 AM
schererboy
Other than iwreckshop, who are the BAD SE p0sters? Quote

      
m