Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016
View Poll Results: Who will win the Stanley Cup?
Washington Capitals
15 22.73%
Chicago Blackhawks
13 19.70%
Tampa Bay Lightning
1 1.52%
LA Kings
13 19.70%
Pittsburgh Penguins
6 9.09%
Anaheim Ducks
2 3.03%
New York Rangers
2 3.03%
St. Louis Blues
2 3.03%
San Jose Sharks
3 4.55%
WANGZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
9 13.64%

04-11-2016 , 10:39 PM
Take it up with 2p2 for only allowing 10 poll options.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-11-2016 , 10:54 PM
Wild 30 to 1 Wangz 40 to 1

I mean seriously though we have no shot it sounds like no Parise, no Vanek, no Haula game one. Yikes.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-11-2016 , 11:25 PM
don't worry, oates is handling the coaching duties behind the scenes.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 12:46 AM
I would like to welcome you all to The Stanley Cup Playoffs aka The Chicago Blackhawks Victory Lap.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 04:05 AM
A+ op.

here for a 3rd ring.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 05:01 AM
Its happening!



so excited
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 06:20 AM
WANGZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

Can't wait til San Jose gets up to a 3-0 lead again, loses the next 3, and Joe Thornton ****s his pants during the warmups to Game 7
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 07:31 AM
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 08:16 AM
looking forward to sharks-caps cup final
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 08:48 AM
In for Joseph Eric Thornton for another strong playoff campaign.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 08:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NhlNut
TheRockClapping.gif



Oh hey, look at the fancy stats predictor:

KANGZ







That Flyers girl << Flyers Girl (rip)



LOL Chokez

Lol 72o (Quacks?!?)


The chokez were so pathetic this year that they failed to qualify for the playoffs. True story.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 09:52 AM
Let the Salary Cup Playoffs begin! Just want San Jose take a big lead and then any outcome is good.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 10:00 AM
A+ op, but spoiler alert: Rangers will win


Sent from my SM-G360T1 using Tapatalk
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 10:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by NhlNut




what do people think of this guys model?

He has Philly / Wash as a 50/50 series yet you can find Phily +350 so I mean that's a YOOOOGE discrepancy.

Would like someone to discredit his model before I go back up the truck on the Flyers
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 11:29 AM
well, SAP has the Flyers in five so obviously it's time to splash on them
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 11:39 AM
I'm in favor of team corsi stats but I don't think they tell the whole story as there are potential flaws so I personally wouldn't be betting on the Flyers and I'll give you one example...

The Capitals have some really good shooters on their team and in fact have the highest shooting percentage in the league five on five so guys like Ovechkin who score 50 goals basically every year aren't doing it by fluke so you have to take into account those factors as well.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 12:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediocrePlayer2.0
what do people think of this guys model?

He has Philly / Wash as a 50/50 series yet you can find Phily +350 so I mean that's a YOOOOGE discrepancy.

Would like someone to discredit his model before I go back up the truck on the Flyers
nerds don't like the caps
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 12:15 PM
Will be in DC sat nite/Chicago sun afternoon.

I think Panarin has been watching a lot of O sniping on PPs from the right circle
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 12:16 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MediocrePlayer2.0
what do people think of this guys model?

He has Philly / Wash as a 50/50 series yet you can find Phily +350 so I mean that's a YOOOOGE discrepancy.

Would like someone to discredit his model before I go back up the truck on the Flyers
The model is based on a massive over reliance on super recent play it seems. It'll swing like 15 points seemingly over night. Philly has been playing well of late, but the Caps seem to have righted the ship as far as process goes, and that's even with them sitting guys and rolling all four lines to keep guys fresh. I know they're the Caps so they'll make **** hard regardless of what happens, but the Flyers are a one line team if they keep voracek, giroux, and Simmons together. This shouldn't be a series, it shouldn't be 50/50 (or +350 for that matter). Caps in 6.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 12:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalblue
well, SAP has the Flyers in five so obviously it's time to splash on them
Snider death cup ??

If Mason can hold we'll have a series.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 12:19 PM
Advanced stats are insightful but the statisticians don't account for things you can only glean by watching games. People talk about the Rangers' possession stats and shots for/against but the Rangers' style is to keep everything to the outside and let Henrik see the shots. Those aren't high quality scoring opportunities. And then people say how the Rangers' are lucky with their high shooting percentage on goals but if you've watched the Rangers you know how they always try to go for the perfect pass that leads to a wide open net. They overpass all the time but when it connects they have tap-ins. Possessing the puck doesn't always mean you're doing something with it.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 12:25 PM
i mean maybe the rangers really are an exception and Lundqvist obviously makes a difference, but we've heard the whole "keep shots to the outside and create high quality shots" stuff from Leafs, Avs and Flames fans in recent years and that didn't hold up particularly well
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 01:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Financier
Advanced stats are insightful but the statisticians don't account for things you can only glean by watching games. People talk about the Rangers' possession stats and shots for/against but the Rangers' style is to keep everything to the outside and let Henrik see the shots. Those aren't high quality scoring opportunities. And then people say how the Rangers' are lucky with their high shooting percentage on goals but if you've watched the Rangers you know how they always try to go for the perfect pass that leads to a wide open net. They overpass all the time but when it connects they have tap-ins. Possessing the puck doesn't always mean you're doing something with it.
Why wouldn't an "expected goals" model capture this?
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 01:42 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by royalblue
looking forward to sharks-caps cup final
not enough heimlich maneuvers in the world for that to happen.
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote
04-12-2016 , 02:01 PM
Advanced stats can't account for the fact that the hockey gods are prepared to rig every game for the Rangers
NHL Stanley Cup Playoffs 2016 Quote

      
m