Quote:
Originally Posted by prohornblower
So legit questions here:
SE's reaction to the following statements:
"Dolphins just offered their 2012 first and 2013 first for Tom Brady."
"Bears just offered their 2012 first and 2013 first for Tom Brady."
"Colts just offered their 2012 first and 2013 first for Tom Brady."
... would be "Sounds good" for all three teams?
I think all 3 would be the biggest steals in trade history(in favor of the team getting Brady) and I would be shocked at wtf NE was thinking. The Bears would instantly become super bowl contenders this year(or even favorites), the Dolphins would be super bowl contenders in 2012, and the Colts would be able to make some crazy trade with Brady/Manning that would leave them with a ton of assets.
Quote:
Originally Posted by GeoffRas22
i know im not the most objective on this topic
but wouldnt bellicheck (if he didnt have to deal with fans/media) snap call cutler + 2 1sts for brady? cheaper/6 years younger- cutler has proved that he can be a fantastic QB with great weaponzzz (denver 08) and they cud use the $ and 2 1sts to improve the rest of their team
No imo. All you can realistically ask for in the variance filled NFL is a legit shot at contending- The Pats have that for the next ~5 years with Brady, and theres no need to risk that. I think Cutler + 4 1sts would do it though.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g1212
Keep sucking Cam's dick then everyone. We'll see how he turns out. I'll admit I'm wrong if I am.
So far in his career you've been dead wrong, yet I don't see you admitting anything. So I'm skeptical that you will do what you say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g1212
THANK YOU. omg. It's unreal, the guy ran good throwing up some prayers to steve smith while throwing 3 INTs a game, and all the sudden he's the next Rodgers. And I forgot to bitch in my last post about the guy calling him a star. LOLOLOLOL at you, he's not a star. Idc about his relative rookie stats to other greats. You have to become a great for that to matter. Right now he's unreal overrated.
So you're saying that a QB's rookie numbers offer us no predictive value whatsoever? Maybe I'm just not understanding what you mean by "I don't care", but thats what it sounds like, and if so thats insane.
Quote:
Originally Posted by g1212
Oh so funny, I go to college so I'm an idiot. And your whole argument for Cam is he's got a good arm and can run, while just assuming he'll grow out of his interception and lack of intelligence habit.
No, his "entire" argument is that a player's performance has predictive value, and Cam's rookie performance gives us severe indications that he will be a GOAT type player. You on the other hand "don't care" about how a player does in his rookie year(until he "becomes a great").
Quote:
Originally Posted by g1212
Anyway what's wrong with me saying he won't be a star?
Nothing if you put together a well thought out argument for it. However, you entire argument seems to say:
I don't care about his stats.
Well except his INTs, those a really bad, ya know!
He is 1-5(nevermind that he joined the worst team in the league and that their pyth w/l is much better than 1-5 would indicate)
Therefore, he is overrated.
Thats an absurd argument, and thats why everyone disagrees with you.