Quote:
Originally Posted by nath
If your coach can't adapt his scheme to maximize the talents of his best players, he's a bad coach. (Which may not be news, I suppose, but I just don't understand these teams that hire coaches like this. What do they say in the interview? "Well, I know we have good players at X, Y, and Z, but I'd like to marginalize them in favor of overly complicated schemes that make it look like I'm doing something creative.")
Football coaches in general seem to be excessively stubborn on these matters. For how long did Atlanta try to get Vick to run a WCO? If those teams hadn't been so dominant running the ball they would've won like 3-4 games a year instead of going to the playoffs.
Belichick is the only exception as a head coach that I can think of off the top of my head. This era of the Pats are the only teams I've ever watched that were capable of adjusting gameplans and schemes in a significant fashion between weeks and within games.
Some of the better Ravens teams also had the ability to play multiple fronts on D, but most of those coordinators turned out to be trash as HCs.