Quote:
Originally Posted by ZBTHorton
I'm confused as to why we can't use the records/results of teams coaches have been involved with in order to make arguments about their possible future success with different teams/roles.
can you honestly tell me you know the first thing about Chuck Pagano, other than he used to be the DC of the Ravens? did you know what he looked like before today? what he's good at? bad at? or if he's better suited to be a HC than, say, Caldwell was? (back when he was hired, not looking backwards)
I know he was the DC of a great defense, but have no idea how much of that is due to him, vs due to
- his HC
- Rex Ryan (or some previous DC's system)
- tons of great players, including 3 HOF players
- assistants working for him
- some other **** I can't even think of
and then, how all of this compares to other people?
there is plenty of stuff we can debate and discuss with some degree of intelligence.
how Bill O'Brien will do as Penn St. coach isn't one of them, since none of us really have the first clue about him. except that he screams at Brady sometimes.